Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33249470›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2021

Identifying the Best Questions for Rapid Screening of Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Children.

Albert J Ksinan, Yaou Sheng, Elizabeth K Do, Julia C Schechter, Junfeng Jim Zhang, Rachel L Maguire, Cathrine Hoyo, Susan K Murphy, Scott H Kollins, Bruce Rubin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Is secondhand smoke exposure associated with poor periodontal status in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Albert J KsinanDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.ORCID 0000-0003-3900-5098
Yaou ShengRAND Corporation, Arlington, VA.
Elizabeth K DoDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.ORCID 0000-0003-3503-1731
Julia C SchechterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-5362-2765
Junfeng Jim ZhangNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Rachel L MaguireDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Cathrine HoyoDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-2466-8617
Susan K MurphyObstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-8298-7272
Scott H KollinsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Bruce RubinDepartment of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Bernard F FuemmelerDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES025128 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Sue Fenton · 2015 to 2026
$18.3M
Project 3: Epigenomic Consequences of Early Life Environmental Tobacco Smoke P01ES022831 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, SUSAN KAY · 2013 to 2018
$4.1M
Nutrition, Deregulation of Imprinted GenesR01ES016772 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HOYO, CATHRINE · 2009 to 2013
$3.1M
Smoking/Nicotine Dependence in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)K24DA023464 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KOLLINS, SCOTT H · 2008 to 2018
$1.5M
Insulin-like Growth Factors and Esophageal CancerK01CA104517 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HOYO, CATHRINE · 2004 to 2008
$671k
In-utero Exposure and Infant Loss of IGF2 ImprintingR21ES014947 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HOYO, CATHRINE · 2006 to 2007
$384k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA104517NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA023464NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES022831NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES025128NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016772NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES014947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany children suffer from secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe), which leads to a variety of negative health consequences. However, there is no consensus on how clinicians can best query parents for possible SHSe among children. We employed a data-driven approach to create an efficient screening tool for clinicians to quickly and correctly identify children at risk for SHSe.

methodsSurvey data from mothers and biospecimens from children were ascertained from the Neurodevelopment and Improving Children's Health following Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure (NICHES) study. Included were mothers and their children whose saliva were assayed for cotinine (n = 351 pairs, mean child age = 5.6 years). Elastic net regression predicting SHSe, as indicated from cotinine concentration, was conducted on available smoking-related questions and cross-validated with 2015-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data to select the most predictive items of SHSe among children (n = 1670, mean child age = 8.4 years).

resultsAnswering positively to at least one of the two final items ("During the past 30 days, did you smoke cigarettes at all?" and "Has anyone, including yourself, smoked tobacco in your home in the past 7 days?") showed area under the curve = .82, and good specificity (.88) and sensitivity (.74). These results were validated with similar items in the nationally representative NHANES sample, area under the curve = .82, specificity = .78, and sensitivity = .77.

conclusionsOur data-driven approach identified and validated two items that may be useful as a screening tool for a speedy and accurate assessment of SHSe among children. IMPLICATIONS: The current study used a rigorous data-driven approach to identify questions that could reliably predict SHSe among children. Using saliva cotinine concentration levels as a gold standard for determining SHSe, our analysis employing elastic net regression identified two questions that served as good classifier for distinguishing children who might be at risk for SHSe. The two items that we validated in the current study can be readily used by clinicians, such as pediatricians, as part of screening procedures to quickly identify whether children might be at risk for SHSe.

Indexed as

Tobacco Smoke PollutionChildChild, PreschoolCotinineHumansNutrition SurveysParentsSalivaCotinineTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID33249470
PMCPMC8186417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.