ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2021
High-resolution population-specific recombination rates and their effect on phasing and genotype imputation.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Analytical expectations for ancestry junction accumulation in admixed genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- ViLR: a novel virtual long read method for breakpoint identification and direct SNP haplotyping in de novo PGT-SR carriers without a proband.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Article
- Prognostic importance of direct assignment of parent of origin via long-read genome and epigenome sequencing in retinoblastoma.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Taking identity-by-descent analysis into the wild: Estimating realized relatedness in free-ranging macaques.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Recombination map tailored to Native Hawaiians may improve robustness of genomic scans for positive selection.Human genetics · 2024Article
- Genotype imputation accuracy and the quality metrics of the minor ancestry in multi-ancestry reference panels.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- A Pipeline for Phasing and Genotype Imputation on Mixed Human Data (Parents-Offspring Trios and Unrelated Subjects) by Reviewing Current Methods and Software.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Sex-biased admixture and assortative mating shape genetic variation and influence demographic inference in admixed Cabo Verdeans.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Individual Genetic Heterogeneity.Genes · 2022Review
- The recombination landscape of the Khoe-San likely represents the upper limits of recombination divergence in humans.Genome biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Fine human genetic map based on UK10K data set.Human genetics · 2022Article
- Inferring recombination patterns in African populations.Human molecular genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research has shown that using population-specific reference panels has a significant effect on downstream population genomic analyses like haplotype phasing, genotype imputation, and association, especially in the context of population isolates. Here, we developed a high-resolution recombination rate mapping at 10 and 50 kb scale using high-coverage (20-30×) whole-genome sequenced data of 55 family trios from Finland and compared it to recombination rates of non-Finnish Europeans (NFE). We tested the downstream effects of the population-specific recombination rates in statistical phasing and genotype imputation in Finns as compared to the same analyses performed by using the NFE-based recombination rates. We found that Finnish recombination rates have a moderately high correlation (Spearman's ρ = 0.67-0.79) with NFE, although on average (across all autosomal chromosomes), Finnish rates (2.268 ± 0.4209 cM/Mb) are 12-14% lower than NFE (2.641 ± 0.5032 cM/Mb). Finnish recombination map was found to have no significant effect in haplotype phasing accuracy (switch error rates ~2%) and average imputation concordance rates (97-98% for common, 92-96% for low frequency and 78-90% for rare variants). Our results suggest that haplotype phasing and genotype imputation mostly depend on population-specific contexts like appropriate reference panels and their sample size, but not on population-specific recombination maps. Even though recombination rate estimates had some differences between the Finnish and NFE populations, haplotyping and imputation had not been noticeably affected by the recombination map used. Therefore, the currently available HapMap recombination maps seem robust for population-specific phasing and imputation pipelines, even in the context of relatively isolated populations like Finland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.