ArticleJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2021
Early Results of Unilateral Prostatic Artery Embolization as a Focal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer under Active Surveillance: Cancer Prostate Embolisation, a Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03407963 (Feasibility of Prostatic Arterial Embolization in Low-risk Patients With Unilateral Prostate Cancer Under Active Surveillance), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility of Prostatic Arterial Embolization in Low-risk Patients With Unilateral Prostate Cancer Under Active Surveillance: Monocentric Pilot Study
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and Safety of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Oncological results and cancer control definition in focal therapy for Prostate Cancer: a systematic review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Expanding the Scope of Interventional Oncology: Locoregional Therapies in Extrahepatic Malignancies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Prostate artery embolization as an effective treatment for clinically significant prostate cancer‑related hemorrhage: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
- Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Recent Advances and Insights.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Prostatic Artery Embolization in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single Center Pilot Study.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Article
- Intratumoural immunotherapy plus focal thermal ablation for localized prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024Review
- Minimally Invasive Procedures in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: an Interventional Radiologist's Perspective.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Application Effect of Bladder Function Training Combined with Kangaiping Pills on Permanent Bladder Stoma after Radical Prostatectomy.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Prostate Artery Embolization in the Setting of Prostate Cancer: Review and Opinion.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the feasibility of prostatic artery embolization in patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PC) under active surveillance (AS).
methodsThis monocentric prospective pilot study, running from June 2018 to June 2019, included 10 patients with low-risk PC under AS, median age 72 years (range, 62-77 years), with a unilateral focal lesion visible on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 score ≥3/5 confirmed by multiparametric MR imaging-targeted biopsy and Gleason score 6. The patients underwent unilateral prostatic artery embolization with 300-500 μm Embospheres in the affected prostatic lobe. The primary endpoint was technical feasibility (prostate and no off-target ischemia in the imaging). The secondary endpoints included safety, negative biopsies/MR imaging response/functional outcomes at 6 months, and oncologic efficacy at 1 year.
resultsEmbolization was successfully achieved in all patients; prostate ischemia was confirmed on multiparametric MR imaging, and no off-target ischemia was reported. No major complications were reported. Four patients (40%) presented with both negative targeted and systematic biopsies at 6 months. No lesions were seen on the MR imaging in 30% of patients. The mean International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function score were 7 and 19 and 5 and 20 at baseline and 6 months, respectively, with no significant difference. Nine patients (90%) were still under AS at 1 year. One patient (10%) had PC progression outside the target lesion and was switched over to curative radiotherapy.
conclusionsProstatic artery embolization is feasible and appears safe for prostate cancer patients under AS, with no impact on erectile function or continence status. These results justify the pursuit of further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.