Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33248898›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2021

Structuring Knowledge with Cognitive Maps and Cognitive Graphs.

Michael Peer, Iva K Brunec, Nora S Newcombe, Russell A Epstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cognitive maps as a medium for thought.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. A neuro-behavioural model of neophobia.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Medial temporal lobe encodes cognitive maps of real-world social networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Memory reactivation during sleep promotes structure abstraction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Building Goal-Directed Cognitive Graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Spaces and sequences in the hippocampus: a homological perspective.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  12. Layers of Social Meaning: Innate, Acquired, and Deliberative Levels of Referential Signal Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cognitive Maps in the Prefrontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  19. Parallel systems for social and spatial cognition reaching the cortical apex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael PeerDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Iva K BrunecDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Nora S NewcombeDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Russell A EpsteinDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: epstein@psych.upenn.edu.

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Landmark-based NavigationR01EY022350 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RUSSELL A EPSTEIN · 2013 to 2026
$5.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and animals use mental representations of the spatial structure of the world to navigate. The classical view is that these representations take the form of Euclidean cognitive maps, but alternative theories suggest that they are cognitive graphs consisting of locations connected by paths. We review evidence suggesting that both map-like and graph-like representations exist in the mind/brain that rely on partially overlapping neural systems. Maps and graphs can operate simultaneously or separately, and they may be applied to both spatial and nonspatial knowledge. By providing structural frameworks for complex information, cognitive maps and cognitive graphs may provide fundamental organizing schemata that allow us to navigate in physical, social, and conceptual spaces.

Indexed as

Spatial NavigationAnimalsBrainCognitionHumansKnowledgeSpace Perceptiongrid cellshippocampusmemoryretrosplenial complexsemantic knowledgespatial navigationvisual scenes

Identifiers

PMID33248898
PMCPMC7746605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.