Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33248812›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2022

Anthropomorphic lung phantom based validation of in-room proton therapy 4D-CBCT image correction for dose calculation.

David Bondesson, Arturs Meijers, Guillaume Janssens, Simon Rit, Moritz Rabe, Florian Kamp, Katharina Niepel, Lydia A den Otter, Stefan Both, Sebastien Brousmiche and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of volumetric image guidance in proton therapy.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

David BondessonDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany. Electronic address: david.bondesson@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Arturs MeijersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Guillaume JanssensAdvanced Technology Group, Ion Beam Applications SA Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Simon RitUniversity of Lyon, CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220; Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Moritz RabeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian KampDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katharina NiepelDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching, Germany.
Lydia A den OtterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Stefan BothDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sebastien BrousmicheAdvanced Technology Group, Ion Beam Applications SA Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Julien DinkelDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany; Department of Radiology, Asklepios Lung Center Munich-Gauting, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.
Katia ParodiDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching, Germany.
Antje KnopfDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Division for Medical Radiation Physics, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany.
Christopher KurzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching, Germany.
Guillaume LandryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching, Germany. Electronic address: Guillaume.Landry@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DEIon Beam Applications (Belgium) · BEUniversity of Groningen · NLCarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVentilation-induced tumour motion remains a challenge for the accuracy of proton therapy treatments in lung patients. We investigated the feasibility of using a 4D virtual CT (4D-vCT) approach based on deformable image registration (DIR) and motion-aware 4D CBCT reconstruction (MA-ROOSTER) to enable accurate daily proton dose calculation using a gantry-mounted CBCT scanner tailored to proton therapy.

methodsVentilation correlated data of 10 breathing phases were acquired from a porcine ex-vivo functional lung phantom using CT and CBCT. 4D-vCTs were generated by (1) DIR of the mid-position 4D-CT to the mid-position 4D-CBCT (reconstructed with the MA-ROOSTER) using a diffeomorphic Morphons algorithm and (2) subsequent propagation of the obtained mid-position vCT to the individual 4D-CBCT phases. Proton therapy treatment planning was performed to evaluate dose calculation accuracy of the 4D-vCTs. A robust treatment plan delivering a nominal dose of 60Gy was generated on the average intensity image of the 4D-CT for an approximated internal target volume (ITV). Dose distributions were then recalculated on individual phases of the 4D-CT and the 4D-vCT based on the optimized plan. Dose accumulation was performed for 4D-vCT and 4D-CT using DIR of each phase to the mid position, which was chosen as reference. Dose based on the 4D-vCT was then evaluated against the dose calculated on 4D-CT both, phase-by-phase as well as accumulated, by comparing dose volume histogram (DVH) values (D

resultsGood agreement was found between the 4D-CT and 4D-vCT-based ITV-DVH curves. The relative differences ((CT-vCT)/CT) between accumulated values of ITV D

conclusionsFeasibility of the suggested 4D-vCT workflow using proton therapy specific imaging equipment was shown. Results indicate the potential of the method to be applied for daily 4D proton dose estimation.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsProton TherapySpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyAnimalsChickensCone-Beam Computed TomographyFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLungMalePhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedSwine4D-vCTCone-beamMotionProton therapyThoraxTomography

Identifiers

PMID33248812
PMCPMC9948846
OpenAlexW3110446794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.