Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33248595›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Phytate degradation, myo-inositol release, and utilization of phosphorus and calcium by two strains of laying hens in five production periods.

Vera Sommerfeld, Korinna Huber, Jörn Bennewitz, Amélia Camarinha-Silva, Martin Hasselmann, Siriluck Ponsuksili, Jana Seifert, Volker Stefanski, Klaus Wimmers, Markus Rodehutscord

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in physiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vera SommerfeldInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Korinna HuberInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Jörn BennewitzInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Amélia Camarinha-SilvaInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Martin HasselmannInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Siriluck PonsuksiliLeibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Institute for Genome Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany.
Jana SeifertInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Volker StefanskiInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Klaus WimmersLeibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Institute for Genome Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany.
Markus RodehutscordInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany. Electronic address: inst450@uni-hohenheim.de.
University of Hohenheim · DEResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare 2 laying hen strains in 5 production periods regarding phytase activity, phytate (InsP

Indexed as

6-PhytaseAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaCalciumInositolPhosphorusPhytic AcidAnimal FeedAnimalsChickensDietFemaleMaleRandom Allocation6-PhytaseCalciumInositolPhosphorusPhytic Acidlaying henmucosal phytasemyo-inositolphosphorusphytate degradation

Identifiers

PMID33248595
PMCPMC7704748
OpenAlexW3088927320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.