Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33248583›Full record

ReviewPoultry science2020

Potential contaminants and hazards in alternative chicken bedding materials and proposed guidance levels: a review.

Priscilla F Gerber, Nic Gould, Eugene McGahan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Pilot Study on the Action ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Efficacy of a Biocidal Paint in ControllingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Priscilla F GerberAnimal Science, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. Electronic address: pgerber2@une.edu.au.
Nic GouldIntegrity Ag and Environment, New England Highway, Highfields, QLD 4352, Australia.
Eugene McGahanIntegrity Ag and Environment, New England Highway, Highfields, QLD 4352, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bedding material or litter is an important requirement of meat chicken production which can influence bird welfare, health, and food safety. A substantial increase in demand and cost of chicken bedding has stimulated interest in alternative bedding sources worldwide. However, risks arising from the use of alternative bedding materials for raising meat chickens are currently unknown. Organic chemicals, elemental, and biological contaminants, as well as physical and management hazards need to be managed in litter to protect the health of chickens and consequently that of human consumers. This requires access to information on the transfer of contaminants from litter to food to inform risk profiles and assessments to guide litter risk management. In this review, contaminants and hazards of known and potential concern in alternative bedding are described and compared with existing standards for feed. The contaminants considered in this review include organic chemical contaminants (e.g., pesticides), elemental contaminants (e.g., arsenic, cadmium, and lead), biological contaminants (phytotoxins, mycotoxins, and microorganisms), physical hazards, and management hazards. Reference is made to scientific literature for acceptable levels of the above contaminants in chicken feed that can be used for guidance by those involved in selecting and using bedding materials.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBedding and LinensChickensAnimalsArsenicFood SafetyOrganic ChemicalsArsenicOrganic Chemicalsalternative litterbroilercontaminantsguidance levelsmeat chicken

Identifiers

PMID33248583
PMCPMC7705057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.