Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33248570›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Effects of glucose oxidase on growth performance, immune function, and intestinal barrier of ducks infected with Escherichia coli O88.

Jiao Liu, Guohua Liu, Zhimin Chen, Aijuan Zheng, Huiyi Cai, Wenhuan Chang, Chong Li, Jiang Chen, Zhengke Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Combination Effects ofBiology · 2026
    Article
  2. AAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Oral supplementation withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiao LiuFeed Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Guohua LiuFeed Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhimin ChenFeed Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Aijuan ZhengFeed Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Huiyi CaiFeed Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wenhuan ChangFeed Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: changwenhuan@caas.cn.
Chong LiFeed Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiang ChenFeed Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhengke WuFeed Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Feed Research Institute · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The negative effects of dietary antibiotics have become a widespread concern. It is imperative to search for a new type of green, safe, and efficient feed additive that can replace antibiotics. This study was to investigate the effects of glucose oxidase (GOD) on growth performance, immune function, and intestinal barrier in ducks infected with Escherichia coli O88. First, we established the E. coli challenge model of ducks through a preliminary experiment and then carried out the formal experiment by using 144 1-day-old male lean Peking ducklings (50 ± 2.75 g). All ducks were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dietary treatment groups of basal diet (control), 30 mg/kg virginiamycin (antibiotic), and 200 U/kg GOD (1,000 U/g). Each group consisted of 6 replications with 8 birds per replicate. At day 7, all ducks were orally administered 0.2 mL E coli O88 (3 × 10

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsDucksEscherichia coli InfectionsGlucose OxidaseImmunityIntestinal MucosaPoultry DiseasesAnimalsDietEscherichia coliMaleRandom AllocationGlucose OxidaseduckEscherichia coli challengeglucose oxidaseimmune functionintestinal barrier

Identifiers

PMID33248570
PMCPMC7705042
OpenAlexW3088219900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.