Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33248564›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Dietary supplementation with anti-IL-10 antibody during a severe Eimeria challenge in broiler chickens.

M S Abdul Rasheed, U P Tiwari, M L Oelschlager, B N Smith, J C Jespersen, J Escobar, N Olmeda-Geniec, R N Dilger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. UnderstandingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Dietary supplementation of sulfur amino acids improves intestinal immunity toAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M S Abdul RasheedDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
U P TiwariDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
M L OelschlagerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
B N SmithDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
J C JespersenDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
J EscobarNutritional Health, Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.
N Olmeda-GeniecNutritional Health, Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.
R N DilgerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. Electronic address: rdilger2@illinois.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USElanco (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attenuation of host IL-10 activity during Eimeria infection may elicit a robust Th1 response to eliminate the parasite from the gut epithelium. An experiment was conducted to study the effects of feeding IL-10 neutralizing antibody delivered via a dried egg product (DEP) on growth performance, immune responsivity, and gut health outcomes during a severe challenge with either Eimeria acervulina (study 1) or Eimeria tenella (study 2) following FDA CVM #217 protocol to test anticoccidial products. A total of 720 male Ross 308 chicks were used in each study, with 15 replicate cages of 12 birds and the following 4 treatments: sham-inoculated (uninfected) control diet (UCON), Eimeria-infected control diet (ICON), and Eimeria-infected control diet supplemented with DEP at 2 levels (165 [I-165] or 287 [I-287] U/tonne in study 1 and 143 [I-143] or 287 [I-287] U/tonne in study 2). Individual birds assigned to infected treatment groups received a single oral dose of either 200,000 E. acervulina (study 1) or 80,000 E. tenella (study 2) oocysts at 12 d of age (i.e., d post inoculation [DPI] 0), whereas uninfected birds were sham-inoculated with tap water. A one-way ANOVA was performed on outcomes including growth performance, hematology, serum chemistry profiles, immunophenotyping profiles, and intestinal lesion scores. In both studies, DPI 0 to 7 weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio were worse (P < 0.05) in all infected groups compared with the UCON group. Compared with ICON, DEP supplementation elicited no differences on overall growth performance. Histopathology and lesion scores revealed severe damage to the gut epithelium owing to the Eimeria challenge, yet DEP supplementation did not improve these outcomes or oocyst shedding, hematological measurements, or serum chemistry. However, DEP supplementation improved (P < 0.05) the percentage of circulating CD3

Indexed as

CoccidiosisDietary SupplementsInterleukin-10Poultry DiseasesAnimalsAntibodiesChickensEimeriaMaleAntibodiesInterleukin-10broileregg productEimeriafeed additiveIL-10 neutralizing antibody

Identifiers

PMID33248564
PMCPMC7705005
OpenAlexW3084895461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.