Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33248550›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Sensitivity analysis based on the random forest machine learning algorithm identifies candidate genes for regulation of innate and adaptive immune response of chicken.

Aneta Polewko-Klim, Wojciech Lesiński, Agnieszka Kitlas Golińska, Krzysztof Mnich, Maria Siwek, Witold R Rudnicki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aneta Polewko-KlimInstitute of Computer Science, University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland. Electronic address: anetapol@uwb.edu.pl.
Wojciech LesińskiInstitute of Computer Science, University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.
Agnieszka Kitlas GolińskaInstitute of Computer Science, University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.
Krzysztof MnichComputational Centre, University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.
Maria SiwekAnimal Biotechnology and Genetics Department, University of Technology and Life Sciences, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Witold R RudnickiInstitute of Computer Science, University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland; Computational Centre, University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland; Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
University of Białystok · PLBydgoszcz University of Science and Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two categories of immune responses-innate and adaptive immunity-have both polygenic backgrounds and a significant environmental component. The goal of the reported study was to define candidate genes and mutations for the immune traits of interest in chickens using machine learning-based sensitivity analysis for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in candidate genes defined in quantitative trait loci regions. Here the adaptive immunity is represented by the specific antibody response toward keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), whereas the innate immunity was represented by natural antibodies toward lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA). The analysis consisted of 3 basic steps: an identification of candidate SNPs via feature selection, an optimisation of the feature set using recursive feature elimination, and finally a gene-level sensitivity analysis for final selection of models. The predictive model based on 5 genes (MAPK8IP3 CRLF3, UNC13D, ILR9, and PRCKB) explains 14.9% of variance for KLH adaptive response. The models obtained for LTA and LPS use more genes and have lower predictive power, explaining respectively 7.8 and 4.5% of total variance. In comparison, the linear models built on genes identified by a standard statistical analysis explain 1.5, 0.5, and 0.3% of variance for KLH, LTA, and LPS response, respectively. The present study shows that machine learning methods applied to systems with a complex interaction network can discover phenotype-genotype associations with much higher sensitivity than traditional statistical models. It adds contribution to evidence suggesting a role of MAPK8IP3 in the adaptive immune response. It also indicates that CRLF3 is involved in this process as well. Both findings need additional verification.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAlgorithmsChickensImmunity, InnateMachine LearningAnimalsQuantitative Trait Locichickenimmune responsemachine learningmarker gene

Identifiers

PMID33248550
PMCPMC7704721
OpenAlexW3084711165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.