Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33248520›Full record

ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2020

Preferences for Accessing Electronic Health Records for Research Purposes: Views of Parents Who Have a Child With a Known or Suspected Genetic Condition.

Melissa Raspa, Ryan S Paquin, Derek S Brown, Sara Andrews, Anne Edwards, Rebecca Moultrie, Laura Wagner, MaryKate Frisch, Lauren Turner-Brown, Anne C Wheeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Melissa RaspaRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. Electronic address: mraspa@rti.org.
Ryan S PaquinRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Derek S BrownBrown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Sara AndrewsRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Anne EdwardsRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Rebecca MoultrieRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Laura WagnerRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
MaryKate FrischUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lauren Turner-BrownUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Anne C WheelerRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Funding

Assessing Preferences for Use of Clinical Data Among Individuals with IDD and Their GuardiansR01HD086702 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI RASPA, MELISSA · 2015 to 2017
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to examine parental preferences for researchers accessing their child's electronic health record across 3 groups: those with a child with (1) a known genetic condition (fragile X syndrome FXS), (2) a suspected genetic condition (autism spectrum disorder [ASD]), and (3) no known genetic condition (typically developing).

methodsAfter extensive formative work, a discrete choice experiment was designed consisting of 5 attributes, each with 2 or 3 levels, including (1) type of researcher, (2) the use of personally identifiable information, (3) the use of sensitive information, (4) personal importance of research, and (5) return of results. Stratified mixed logit and latent class conditional logit models were examined.

resultsParents of children with FXS or ASD had relatively higher preferences for research conducted by nonprofits than parents of typically developing children. Parents of children with ASD also preferred research using non-identifiable and nonsensitive information. Parents of children with FXS or ASD also had preferences for research that was personally important and returned either summary or individual results. Although a few child and family characteristics were related to preferences, they did not overall define the subgroups of parents.

conclusionsAlthough electronic health record preference research has been conducted with the general public, this is the first study to examine the opinions of parents who have a child with a known or suspected genetic condition. These parents were open to studies using their child's electronic health record because they may have more to gain from this type of research.

Indexed as

Access to InformationBiomedical ResearchElectronic Health RecordsAutism Spectrum DisorderCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolConfidentialityConsumer BehaviorFemaleFragile X SyndromeGenetic Diseases, InbornHealth LiteracyHumansInfantMaleParentsautism spectrum disorderdiscrete choice experimentelectronic health recordsfragile X syndromegenetic conditions

Identifiers

PMID33248520
PMCPMC7701359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.