Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33247894›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Use of Palpation Imaging in Diagnosis of Breast Diseases: A Way to Improve the Detection Rate.

Yihan Ding, Chenyu Sun, Qin Zhou, Ce Cheng, Cunye Yan, Benzhong Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yihan DingDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Chenyu SunAMITA Health Saint Joseph Hospital Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Qin ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ce ChengDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Arizona College of Medicine at South Campus, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Cunye YanDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Benzhong WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Anhui Medical University · CNMayo Clinic · USSaint Joseph Hospital · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Breast diseases pose increasing threat to women health as peoples lifestyle changes. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical application value of Palpation Imaging (PI) in the diagnosis of breast diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS From October 2019 to February 2020, 184 patients with 225 breast lesions were examined by using PI, ultrasound, and mammography in the department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. All cases were confirmed pathologically by core-needle biopsy or excisional biopsy. The cut-off value of the PI tests was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We compared the examination results of PI with ultrasound and mammography to analyze the diagnostic value of PI. RESULTS Pathological examination revealed that 186/225(82.67%) lesions were benign, while 39 were malignant. All 8 parameters of PI were significantly correlated with pathological findings (P<0.05). The best cut-off value for the PI score was 19.5 and the area under the curve (AUC) for the PI was 0.921 (95% CI: 0.874-0.968, P<0.001) with 89.7% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity. PI showed greater sensitivity (89.7%) and its specificity (86.0% vs. 86.4%, P=0.931) and accuracy (86.7% vs. 84.6%, P=0.604) were similar to those of mammography. The combination of 3 types of test is superior to a single examination. The sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 98.8%. CONCLUSIONS PI has high clinical value in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Combination examination has the potential to improve the detection of breast cancer in screening and diagnostic capacities and can be used as a supplement to ultrasound and mammography.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingPalpationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsChildFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33247894
PMCPMC7709466
OpenAlexW3089631174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.