ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2020
Osteoblastic differentiation of stem cells induced by graphene oxide-hydroxyapatite-alginate hydrogel composites and construction of tissue-engineered bone.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of mechanical properties of carbon-based nanocomposites on scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review.Nanoscale advances · 2024Review
- Development of Graphene-Based Materials in Bone Tissue Engineaering.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2021-06-11Error in Data · Error in Image · Error in Results and/or Conclusions · Investigation by Third Party · · see also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/ECFCB8E0C16F890833196DE1D4D70B
- Retracted
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effect of graphene oxide (GO)-hydroxyapatite (HA)-sodium alginate (SA) composite application in the field of bone tissue engineering. Four scaffold groups were established (SA-HA, SA-HA-0.8%GO, SA-HA-1.0%GO and SA-HA-1.2%GO) and mixed with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Hydrogel viscosity was measured at room temperature, and after freeze-drying and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) to detect substance crystallinity, the printability of each hydrogel type was measured with a printing grid. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe the internal microstructure of the scaffolds and to evaluate the growth and proliferation of cells on the scaffold. A hollow cylinder was printed to compare the forming effect of the hydrogel bioinks, and cell-hydrogel composites were implanted under the skin of nude mice to observe the effect of the hydrogels on osteogenesis in vivo. Increased GO concentrations led to reduced scaffold degradation rates, increased viscosity, increased printability, increased mechanical properties, increased scaffold porosity and increased cell proliferation rates. In vivo experiments showed that hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, Alizarin red staining, alkaline phosphatase staining and collagen type I immunohistochemical staining increased as the implantation time increased. These results demonstrate that GO composites have high printability as bioinks and can be used for bioprinting of bone by altering the ratio of the different components.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.