ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2021
Methanogen Abundance Thresholds Capable of Differentiating In Vitro Methane Production in Human Stool Samples.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Improved Quantitative Real-Time PCR Protocol for Detection and Quantification of Methanogenic Archaea in Stool Samples.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Differential hydrogen sulfide production by a human cohort in response to animal- and plant-based diet interventions.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Article
- Bacteria and Methanogens in the Human Microbiome: a Review of Syntrophic Interactions.Microbial ecology · 2022Review
- Back to the Source: Molecular Identification of Methanogenic Archaea as Markers of Colonic Methane Production.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntestinal methane (CH
aimsIn this study, taxonomic and functional gene analyses and in vitro CH
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study involving full stool samples collected from 33 healthy individuals. In vitro CH
resultsMethanobrevibacter was found to be the most abundant methane producer and its relative abundance provides a clear distinction between CH
conclusionGiven the decreased time-burden placed on patients, a qPCR-based test on a fecal sample can become a valuable tool in clinical assessment of CH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.