ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2020
Evidence for Mental Health Contributions to Medical Care in Diabetes Management: Economic and Professional Considerations.
Review in Current diabetes reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Digital Tools for Diabetes Self-management in Children: A Scoping Review.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2027Review
- Innovation research on college students' mental health management system based on internet of things technology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Comorbid depression and anxiety and their association with health care resource utilization among individuals with type 1 diabetes in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2024Article
- Proactive Identification of Patients with Diabetes at Risk of Uncontrolled Outcomes during a Diabetes Management Program: Conceptualization and Development Study Using Machine Learning.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Patient and Provider Views on Psychosocial Screening in a Comprehensive Diabetes Center.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis paper considers the potential contributions of behavioral health providers to interprofessional, collaborative treatment for diabetes. We have the following objectives: (1) review the behavioral health complications, risks, burdens, and costs associated with diabetes management and consider the role of behavioral health providers in treating mental health concerns specific to diabetes; (2) highlight two frameworks for incorporating behavioral health into diabetes treatment, and review the empirical support for each; and (3) consider the financial feasibility of integrating behavioral health services into diabetes medical care settings. RECENT
findingsThe healthcare field is still in the nascent stages of integrating behavioral health services in endocrinology clinics, but there is growing evidence that integrated behavioral healthcare has the potential to improve disease management and psychological functioning for individuals with chronic medical conditions. Furthermore, as a result of recent changes to the billing structure for behavioral health services in a medical setting, reimbursement rates for behavioral health providers in this capacity have improved considerably. If delivered by qualified behavioral health providers using evidence-based guidelines, behavioral health integration has the potential to optimize health outcomes, improve quality of life, and decrease fragmentation of care for patients with diabetes. Future research should focus on developing a financially feasible, empirically supported model of integrated behavioral health and disseminating the model to medical providers treating patients with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.