Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33247726›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

The Evolutionary Dynamics of Genetic Incompatibilities Introduced by Duplicated Genes in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Wen-Biao Jiao, Vipul Patel, Jonas Klasen, Fang Liu, Petra Pecinkova, Marina Ferrand, Isabelle Gy, Christine Camilleri, Sigi Effgen, Maarten Koornneef and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The variegatedComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Wen-Biao JiaoDepartment of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Vipul PatelDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Jonas KlasenDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Fang LiuDepartment of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Petra PecinkovaDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Marina FerrandInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, France.
Isabelle GyInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, France.
Christine CamilleriInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, France.
Sigi EffgenDepartment of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Maarten KoornneefDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Ales PecinkaDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Olivier LoudetInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, France.
Korbinian SchneebergerDepartment of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DEAgroParisTech · FRLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although gene duplications provide genetic backup and allow genomic changes under relaxed selection, they may potentially limit gene flow. When different copies of a duplicated gene are pseudofunctionalized in different genotypes, genetic incompatibilities can arise in their hybrid offspring. Although such cases have been reported after manual crosses, it remains unclear whether they occur in nature and how they affect natural populations. Here, we identified four duplicated-gene based incompatibilities including one previously not reported within an artificial Arabidopsis intercross population. Unexpectedly, however, for each of the genetic incompatibilities we also identified the incompatible alleles in natural populations based on the genomes of 1,135 Arabidopsis accessions published by the 1001 Genomes Project. Using the presence of incompatible allele combinations as phenotypes for GWAS, we mapped genomic regions that included additional gene copies which likely rescue the genetic incompatibility. Reconstructing the geographic origins and evolutionary trajectories of the individual alleles suggested that incompatible alleles frequently coexist, even in geographically closed regions, and that their effects can be overcome by additional gene copies collectively shaping the evolutionary dynamics of duplicated genes during population history.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationReproductive IsolationAllelesArabidopsisPhylogeographyduplicated genegenetic incompatibilitygenome-wide association studyHPAloss of functionTIM22

Identifiers

PMID33247726
PMCPMC8042742
OpenAlexW3109521338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.