Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33247711›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal2021

Commentary on: Understanding Breast Implant Illness.

Jill M Newby, Samantha Tang, Kate Faasse, Maria J Sharrock, William P Adams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Revision Mastopexy in Aesthetic Breast Surgery.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Truth or Myth: Is Breast Implant Illness Really an Illness?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Extracting big data from the internet to support the development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast implant illness: a proof of concept study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jill M NewbyMRFF Career Development Fellow, Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Samantha TangSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Kate FaasseARC Discovery Early Career Research Fellow, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Maria J SharrockClinical Research Unit for Anxiety & Depression, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
William P AdamsDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
UNSW Sydney · AUBlack Dog Institute · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Australian Medical Research Future Fund Career Development Fellowship APP1145382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast implant surgery is the most common plastic surgery procedure performed globally. A subset of women with breast implants report experiencing a myriad of disabling and distressing physical and psychological symptoms attributed to their implants. Social media groups have coined the condition "breast implant illness" (BII). Little to no scientific research currently exists for BII.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of women with BII (both those with implants still in place and those who have explanted) and compare them with those of a control group of women with implants who do not report BII.

methodsWomen with self-reported BII and implants still in place (n = 51), self-reported BII who had explanted (n = 60), and women with implants in place without BII (n = 58) completed online self-report questionnaires about their symptoms, physical and mental health, health service use patterns, and lifestyle factors (eg, exercise, smoking, alcohol consumption).

resultsWomen with BII, regardless of whether they had undergone explant surgery, reported experiencing more severe somatic symptoms, higher depression, anxiety and health anxiety, and poorer physical health than women without BII.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the need for further investigation into the causes, risk factors, long-term effects, and potential interventions for women who experience BII.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsSocial MediaFemaleHumansSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33247711
OpenAlexW3107575330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.