ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2020
Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity and compressive strength of a dental cement modified using plant extract mixture.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experimental glass ionomer cement modified by the incorporation of nanoselenuim: antibacterial activity, cytocompatibility and compressive strength.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluating immunohistochemical and genetic expression of green-mediated nano-enhanced glass ionomer cement: An animal model study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Improving glass Ionomer performance through plant extracts: a systematic review ofBiomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025Review
- Enhancing the antibacterial and surface hardness of glass ionomer cement modified withPakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Herbalism and glass-based materials in dentistry: review of the current state of the art.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2023Review
- [Influence of paper mixing pads thickness on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cement].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023Article
- Biomimetic approaches and materials in restorative and regenerative dentistry: review article.BMC oral health · 2023Review
- Antibiotic-free antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cements: A state-of-the-art review.World journal of orthopedics · 2022Review
- Antimicrobial Efficacy of Glass Ionomer Cement in Incorporation with BiogenicMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- Shear Bond Strength and Film Thickness of a Naturally Antimicrobial Modified Dental Luting Cement.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Literature lacks sufficient data regarding addition of natural antibacterial agents to glass ionomer cement (GICs). Hence, the aim of the study was to increase the antimicrobial properties of GICs through its modification with mixture of plant extracts to be evaluated along with an 0.5% chlorohexidine-modified GIC (CHX-GIC) with regard to biological and compressive strength properties. Conventional GIC (freeze-dried version) and CHX were used. Alcoholic extract of Salvadora persica, Olea europaea, and Ficus carcia leaves were prepared using a Soxhlet extractor for 12 h. The plant extract mixture (PE) was added in three different proportions to the water used for preparation of the dental cement (Group 1:1 PE, 2:1 PE, and 1:2 PE). Specimens were then prepared and tested against the unmodified GIC (control) and the 0.5% CHX-GIC. Chemical analysis of the extract mixture was performed using Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial activity was evaluated using agar diffusion assay against Micrococcus luteus and Streptoccocus mutans. Compressive strength was evaluated according to ISO 9917-1:2007 using a Zwick testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Antimicrobial activity against Streptoccocus mutans was significantly increased for all the extract-modified materials compared to the unmodified cement, and the highest concentration was comparable to the CHX-GIC mixture. The activity against Micrococcus luteus was also significantly increased, but only for the material with the highest extract concentration, and here the CHX-GIC group showed statistically the highest antimicrobial activity. Compressive strength results revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between the different mixtures and the control except for the highest tested concentration that showed the highest mean values. The plant extracts (PEs) enhanced the antimicrobial activity against S. mutans and also against M. luteus in the higher concentration while compressive strength was improved by addition of the PE at higher concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.