Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33247342›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Reliable segmentation of 2D cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion image sequences using time as the 3rd dimension.

Veit Sandfort, Matthew Jacobs, Andrew E Arai, Li-Yueh Hsu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance expert consensus statement on quantitative myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Guideline
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Veit SandfortStanford Medicine, Pasteur Drive 300, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. veit.sandfort@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7218-9306
Matthew JacobsNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Andrew E AraiNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Li-Yueh HsuNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · US

Funding

Quantification of Myocardial PerfusionZIAHL006137 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI ARAI, ANDREW · 2011 to 2020
$9.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS ZIA HL006137-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) first-pass perfusion is an established noninvasive diagnostic imaging modality for detecting myocardial ischemia. A CMR perfusion sequence provides a time series of 2D images for dynamic contrast enhancement of the heart. Accurate myocardial segmentation of the perfusion images is essential for quantitative analysis and it can facilitate automated pixel-wise myocardial perfusion quantification.

methodsIn this study, we compared different deep learning methodologies for CMR perfusion image segmentation. We evaluated the performance of several image segmentation methods using convolutional neural networks, such as the U-Net in 2D and 3D (2D plus time) implementations, with and without additional motion correction image processing step. We also present a modified U-Net architecture with a novel type of temporal pooling layer which results in improved performance.

resultsThe best DICE scores were 0.86 and 0.90 for LV myocardium and LV cavity, while the best Hausdorff distances were 2.3 and 2.1 pixels for LV myocardium and LV cavity using 5-fold cross-validation. The methods were corroborated in a second independent test set of 20 patients with similar performance (best DICE scores 0.84 for LV myocardium).

conclusionsOur results showed that the LV myocardial segmentation of CMR perfusion images is best performed using a combination of motion correction and 3D convolutional networks which significantly outperformed all tested 2D approaches. Reliable frame-by-frame segmentation will facilitate new and improved quantification methods for CMR perfusion imaging. KEY POINTS: • Reliable segmentation of the myocardium offers the potential to perform pixel level perfusion assessment. • A deep learning approach in combination with motion correction, 3D (2D + time) methods, and a deep temporal connection module produced reliable segmentation results.

Indexed as

HeartMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNeural Networks, ComputerPerfusionCardiac magnetic resonance imagingDeep learningImage segmentationMyocardial perfusion

Identifiers

PMID33247342
OpenAlexW3110350439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.