Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33247285›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2021

Antigen retrieval and clearing for whole-organ immunofluorescence by FLASH.

Hendrik A Messal, Jorge Almagro, May Zaw Thin, Antonio Tedeschi, Alessandro Ciccarelli, Laura Blackie, Kurt I Anderson, Irene Miguel-Aliaga, Jacco van Rheenen, Axel Behrens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Clearing-enabled light sheet microscopy as a novel method for three-dimensional mapping of the sensory innervation of the mouse knee.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hendrik A Messal *Adult Stem Cell Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2259-0286
Jorge Almagro *Adult Stem Cell Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0652-6447
May Zaw ThinAdult Stem Cell Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0036-2776
Antonio TedeschiAdult Stem Cell Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Alessandro CiccarelliAdvanced Light Microscopy Facility, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Laura BlackieMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7058-2382
Kurt I AndersonAdvanced Light Microscopy Facility, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Irene Miguel-AliagaMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jacco van RheenenDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Axel BehrensAdult Stem Cell Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. axel.behrens@icr.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1557-1143
The Francis Crick Institute · GBMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK FC001039Medical Research Council FC001039Medical Research Council MC_UP_1102/3Wellcome Trust FC001039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in light-sheet and confocal microscopy now allow imaging of cleared large biological tissue samples and enable the 3D appreciation of cell and protein localization in their native organ environment. However, the sample preparations for such imaging are often onerous, and their capability for antigen detection is limited. Here, we describe FLASH (fast light-microscopic analysis of antibody-stained whole organs), a simple, rapid, fully customizable technique for molecular phenotyping of intact tissue volumes. FLASH utilizes non-degradative epitope recovery and membrane solubilization to enable the detection of a multitude of membranous, cytoplasmic and nuclear antigens in whole mouse organs and embryos, human biopsies, organoids and Drosophila. Retrieval and immunolabeling of epithelial markers, an obstacle for previous clearing techniques, can be achieved with FLASH. Upon volumetric imaging, FLASH-processed samples preserve their architecture and integrity and can be paraffin-embedded for subsequent histopathological analysis. The technique can be performed by scientists trained in light microscopy and yields results in <1 week.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigensDrosophilaEpitopesFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalKidneyLacrimal ApparatusLiverLungMaleMammary Glands, HumanMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalAntigensEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID33247285
OpenAlexW3110311384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.