Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33247162›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Diet induces parallel changes to the gut microbiota and problem solving performance in a wild bird.

Gabrielle L Davidson, Niamh Wiley, Amy C Cooke, Crystal N Johnson, Fiona Fouhy, Michael S Reichert, Iván de la Hera, Jodie M S Crane, Ipek G Kulahci, R Paul Ross and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gut Microbiome Variations in Herring Gulls (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gabrielle L DavidsonSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. gd339@cam.ac.uk.
Niamh WileyAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Amy C CookeSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland.
Crystal N JohnsonAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Fiona FouhyAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Michael S ReichertSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland.
Iván de la HeraSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland.
Jodie M S CraneSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland.
Ipek G KulahciSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland.
R Paul RossAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Catherine StantonAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
John L QuinnSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. j.quinn@ucc.ie.

Funding

European Research Council 617509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbial community in the gut is influenced by environmental factors, especially diet, which can moderate host behaviour through the microbiome-gut-brain axis. However, the ecological relevance of microbiome-mediated behavioural plasticity in wild animals is unknown. We presented wild-caught great tits (Parus major) with a problem-solving task and showed that performance was weakly associated with variation in the gut microbiome. We then manipulated the gut microbiome by feeding birds one of two diets that differed in their relative levels of fat, protein and fibre content: an insect diet (low content), or a seed diet (high content). Microbial communities were less diverse among individuals given the insect compared to those on the seed diet. Individuals were less likely to problem-solve after being given the insect diet, and the same microbiota metrics that were altered as a consequence of diet were also those that correlated with variation in problem solving performance. Although the effect on problem-solving behaviour could have been caused by motivational or nutritional differences between our treatments, our results nevertheless raise the possibility that dietary induced changes in the gut microbiota could be an important mechanism underlying individual behavioural plasticity in wild populations.

Indexed as

DietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAnimals, WildBehavior, AnimalBiodiversityEcosystemFemaleIrelandMalePasseriformesProblem SolvingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID33247162
PMCPMC7699645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.