Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33247099›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

SARS-CoV-2 genomic and subgenomic RNAs in diagnostic samples are not an indicator of active replication.

Soren Alexandersen, Anthony Chamings, Tarka Raj Bhatta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 202 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
202citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

202 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 327 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. iScience · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

142 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soren AlexandersenGeelong Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. soren.alexandersen@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5039-3178
Anthony ChamingsGeelong Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7762-4757
Tarka Raj BhattaGeelong Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8199-8444
Deakin University · AUBarwon Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first detected in late December 2019 and has spread worldwide. Coronaviruses are enveloped, positive sense, single-stranded RNA viruses and employ a complicated pattern of virus genome length RNA replication as well as transcription of genome length and leader containing subgenomic RNAs. Although not fully understood, both replication and transcription are thought to take place in so-called double-membrane vesicles in the cytoplasm of infected cells. Here we show detection of SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNAs in diagnostic samples up to 17 days after initial detection of infection and provide evidence for their nuclease resistance and protection by cellular membranes suggesting that detection of subgenomic RNAs in such samples may not be a suitable indicator of active coronavirus replication/infection.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralVirus ReplicationAdultCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingCytoplasmFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasopharynxOropharynxPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID33247099
PMCPMC7695715
OpenAlexW3107258715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.