Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33246891›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical education

A Strategy for Undergraduate Medical Education in Urology During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Tad A Manalo, Michelle I Higgins, Brian Pettitt-Schieber, Barbara J Pettitt, Akanksha Mehta, Lindsey M Hartsell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical education. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. A career exploration didactic and simulation-based session increases student knowledge in and exposure to urology.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tad A ManaloDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michelle I HigginsDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Brian Pettitt-SchieberDepartment of General Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Barbara J PettittDepartment of General Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Akanksha MehtaDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lindsey M HartsellDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: lindsey.m.hartsell@emory.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide a framework for a virtual curriculum during the COVID-19 pandemic for medical student educators that introduces and teaches clinical concepts important in urology and surgical specialties in general.

methodsWe created a 1-week virtual urology course utilizing interactive lectures, case-based exercises, and faculty-proctored surgical video reviews. Students were assigned self-study modules and participated in case-based discussions and presentations on a topic of their choice. Students' perceptions of urology as a specialty and the utility of the course was evaluated through pre- and postcourse surveys. Understanding of urologic content was evaluated with a multiple-choice exam.

resultsA total of nine students were enrolled in the course. All students reported increased understanding of the common urologic diagnoses and of urology as a specialty by an average of 2.5 points on a 10-point Likert scale (Cohen's measure of effect size: 3.2). Additionally, 56% of students reported increased interest, 22% reported no change and 22% reported a decreased interest in pursuing urology as a specialty following the course. Students self-reported increased knowledge of a variety of urologic topics on a 10-point Likert scale. The average exam score on the multiple-choice exam improved from 50% before the course to 89% after the course.

conclusionsVarious teaching techniques can be employed through a virtual platform to introduce medical students to the specialty of urology and increase clinical knowledge surrounding common urologic conditions. As the longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic becomes increasingly apparent and virtual teaching is normalized, these techniques can have far-reaching utility within the traditional medical student surgical curriculum.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalUrologyCurriculumHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2CoronavirusCOVID-19Interpersonal and Communication SkillsMedical KnowledgeMedical student educationPatient CarePractice-Based Learning and ImprovementUrologyVirtual education

Identifiers

PMID33246891
PMCPMC7490000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.