ArticleJournal of surgical education
A Strategy for Undergraduate Medical Education in Urology During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Journal of surgical education. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital technology for orthognathic surgery training promotion: a randomized comparative study.PeerJ · 2022Trial
- Urology Interest Groups and Surgical Skills Sessions - Increasing Medical Student Interest in Urology.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- A career exploration didactic and simulation-based session increases student knowledge in and exposure to urology.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024Article
- Beyond COVID-19: the impact of recent pandemics on medical students and their education: a scoping review.Medical education online · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Atlas-Based Mobile Application in Undergraduate Teaching in Oral Histopathology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Systematic Review of the Medical Student Feedback on Undergraduate Surgical Education During the Pandemic.Cureus · 2022Review
- Article
- Review
- How Can We Improve the Delivery of Urology Teaching to Medical Students Using Modern Educational Techniques?Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Readiness, Reception, and Performance of Students in a Communications Course Delivered Amid the Pandemic.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2021Article
- Current Scope of Online Ophthalmology Education and Curriculum Impact Due to COVID-19.Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) · 2021Article
- Negative emotions, cognitive load, acceptance, and self-perceived learning outcome in emergency remote education during COVID-19.Education and information technologies · 2021Article
- Development and validation of a students' remote learning attitude scale (RLAS) in higher education.Education and information technologies · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo provide a framework for a virtual curriculum during the COVID-19 pandemic for medical student educators that introduces and teaches clinical concepts important in urology and surgical specialties in general.
methodsWe created a 1-week virtual urology course utilizing interactive lectures, case-based exercises, and faculty-proctored surgical video reviews. Students were assigned self-study modules and participated in case-based discussions and presentations on a topic of their choice. Students' perceptions of urology as a specialty and the utility of the course was evaluated through pre- and postcourse surveys. Understanding of urologic content was evaluated with a multiple-choice exam.
resultsA total of nine students were enrolled in the course. All students reported increased understanding of the common urologic diagnoses and of urology as a specialty by an average of 2.5 points on a 10-point Likert scale (Cohen's measure of effect size: 3.2). Additionally, 56% of students reported increased interest, 22% reported no change and 22% reported a decreased interest in pursuing urology as a specialty following the course. Students self-reported increased knowledge of a variety of urologic topics on a 10-point Likert scale. The average exam score on the multiple-choice exam improved from 50% before the course to 89% after the course.
conclusionsVarious teaching techniques can be employed through a virtual platform to introduce medical students to the specialty of urology and increase clinical knowledge surrounding common urologic conditions. As the longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic becomes increasingly apparent and virtual teaching is normalized, these techniques can have far-reaching utility within the traditional medical student surgical curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.