Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33246477›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2020

Coverage determinants of breast cancer screening in Flanders: an evaluation of the past decade.

L Ding, S Jidkova, M J W Greuter, K Van Herck, M Goossens, P Martens, G H de Bock, G Van Hal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Geographical inequities in cervical cancer screening coverage in Bolivia: a spatial nationwide ecological study.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

L DingDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
S JidkovaDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
M J W GreuterDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
K Van HerckDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
M GoossensCenter for Cancer Detection, Flanders, Belgium.
P MartensCenter for Cancer Detection, Flanders, Belgium.
G H de BockDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. g.h.de.bock@umcg.nl.
G Van HalDepartment of Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women in the developed world. In order to find developing cancers in an early stage, BC screening is commonly used. In Flanders, screening is performed in and outside an organized breast cancer screening program (BCSP). However, the determinants of BC screening coverage for both screening strategies are yet unknown.

objectiveTo assess the determinants of BC screening coverage in Flanders.

methodsReimbursement data were used to attribute a screening status to each woman in the target population for the years 2008-2016. Yearly coverage data were categorized as screening inside or outside BCSP or no screening. Data were clustered by municipality level. A generalized linear equation model was used to assess the determinants of screening type.

resultsOver all years and municipalities, the median screening coverage rate inside and outside BCSP was 48.40% (IQR: 41.50-54.40%) and 14.10% (IQR: 9.80-19.80%) respectively. A higher coverage rate outside BSCP was statistically significantly (P < 0.001) associated with more crowded households (OR: 3.797, 95% CI: 3.199-4.508), younger age, higher population densities (OR: 2.528, 95% CI: 2.455-2.606), a lower proportion of unemployed job seekers (OR: 0.641, 95% CI: 0.624-0.658) and lower use of dental care (OR: 0.969, 95% CI: 0.967-0.972).

conclusionCoverage rate of BC screening is not optimal in Flanders. Women with low SES that are characterized by younger age, living in a high population density area, living in crowded households, or having low dental care are less likely to be screened for BC in Flanders. If screened, they are more likely to be screened outside the BCSP.

Indexed as

AgedBelgiumBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedBreast neoplasmsCoverage rateMammographyMass screeningSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID33246477
PMCPMC7694412
OpenAlexW3108567355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.