Observational studyBMC health services research2020
The NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme: an observational study of service delivery and patient experience.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness in Relation to the Supporting Clinical Evidence Across the Type 2 Diabetes Continuum: A Review of Metformin and SGLT2is.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Service user experiences of a nationally implemented diabetes prevention programme in England: a qualitative interview study.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Building on the Doha Declaration: a white paper on advancing lifestyle medicine for non-communicable disease prevention and health system transformation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Preventing type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study exploring the complexity of health-related practices in people with prediabetes.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Global challenges in diabetes research and care: which way forward? An appraisal from the EASD Global Council.Diabetologia · 2025Review
- Implementation of diabetes prevention programs into clinical practice and community settings: a systematic search and review.Implementation science communications · 2025Review
- Variation in effectiveness of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme in people diagnosed with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia by age, sex, BMI, and deprivation: A matched cohort analysis of 69,801 people.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Article
- Article
- MAintAin Activity in Arthritis: A study protocol of the co-development and feasibility testing of a physical activity maintenance intervention.HRB open research · 2024Article
- The effectiveness of digital delivery versus group-based face-to-face delivery of the English National Health Service Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Programme: a non-inferiority retrospective cohort comparison study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Article
- Attendance, Weight Loss, and Participation in a Behavioural Diabetes Prevention Programme.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Use of Real-World Data in Population Science to Improve the Prevention and Care of Diabetes-Related Outcomes.Diabetes care · 2023Review
- Article
- The influence of demographic, health and psychosocial factors on patient uptake of the English NHS diabetes prevention programme.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Comparison of weight change between face-to-face and digital delivery of the English National Health service diabetes prevention programme: An exploratory non-inferiority study with imputation of plausible weight outcomes.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Referral to the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme and conversion from nondiabetic hyperglycaemia to type 2 diabetes mellitus in England: A matched cohort analysis.PLoS medicine · 2023Observational
- Population level impact of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme on incidence of type 2 diabetes in England: An observational study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS-DPP) is a nine-month, group-based behavioural intervention for adults in England at risk of developing Type 2 diabetes. Four independent providers were commissioned to deliver versions of the NHS-DPP, in line with NHS England specifications. This observational study maps NHS-DPP delivery in routine practice against the NHS specification, and compares service delivery with observed patient experiences.
methodsResearchers observed service delivery across eight complete NHS-DPP courses (118 sessions, median 14 sessions per course), consenting 455 participants (36 staff, 398 patients, 21 accompanying persons). Key features of NHS-DPP delivery were described using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) framework. Researchers wrote detailed field notes during each session, including observations of patient experience. Field notes were content analysed; instances of positive and negative experiences were labelled and grouped into categories. Researchers used a novel method of comparing observed patient experiences to variations in programme delivery.
resultsDelivery broadly followed NHS England's specification and the plans set out by providers. Deviations included the scheduling and larger group sizes in some sessions. There was variation in the type and format of activities delivered by providers. Positive patient experiences included engagement, satisfaction with the programme, good within-group relationships and reported behavioural changes. Negative experiences included poor scheduling, large groups, and dissatisfaction with the venue. Where more interactive and visual activities were delivered in smaller groups of 10-15 people with good rapport, there were generally more instances of positive patient experiences, and where there were structural issues such as problems with the scheduling of sessions, poor venues and inadequate resources, there tended to be more negative patient experiences.
conclusionsAddressing issues that we have identified as being linked to negative experiences with the NHS-DPP could increase uptake, reduce patient drop-out and increase the overall effectiveness of the programme. In particular, modifying structural aspects of the NHS-DPP (e.g. reliable session scheduling, reducing group sizes, enough session resources) and increasing interaction appear particularly promising for improving these outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.