Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33246458›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2020

Equity and efficiency of health care resource allocation in Jiangsu Province, China.

Qian Li, Jianjun Wei, Fengchang Jiang, Guixiang Zhou, Rilei Jiang, Meijuan Chen, Xu Zhang, Wanjin Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qian LiInstitute of Literature in Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
Jianjun WeiDepartment of Construction Management of Real Estate, School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, P.R. China.
Fengchang JiangTaizhou Polytechnic College, Taizhou, 225300, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
Guixiang ZhouTaizhou Polytechnic College, Taizhou, 225300, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
Rilei JiangSchool of Basic Medicine Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, P.R. China.
Meijuan ChenSchool of Medicine & Holistic Integrative medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu, Nanjing, 210023, P.R. China.
Xu ZhangSchool of Medicine & Holistic Integrative medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu, Nanjing, 210023, P.R. China. zhangxu@njucm.edu.cn.
Wanjin HuInstitute of Literature in Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu, P.R. China. huwj@nj.gov.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-8217-0895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJiangsu was one of the first four pilot provinces to engage in comprehensive health care reform in China, which has been on-going for the past 5 years. This study aims to evaluate the equity, efficiency and productivity of health care resource allocation in Jiangsu Province using the most recent data, analyse the causes of deficiencies, and discuss measures to solve these problems.

methodsData were extracted from the Jiangsu Health/Family Planning Statistical Yearbook (2015-2019) and Jiangsu Statistical Yearbook (2015-2019). The Gini coefficient (G), Theil index (T) and health resource density index (HRDI) were chosen to study the fairness of health resource allocation in Jiangsu Province. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the Malmquist productivity index (MPI) were used to analyse the efficiency and productivity of this allocation.

resultsFrom 2014 to 2018, the total amount of health resources in Jiangsu Province increased. The G of primary resource allocation by population remained below 0.15, and that by geographical area was between 0.14 and 0.28; additionally, the G of health financial resources was below 0.26, and that by geographical area was above 0.39. T was consistent with the results for G and Lorenz curves. The HRDI shows that the allocated amounts of health care resources were the highest in southern Jiangsu, except for the number of health institutions. The average value of TE was above 0.93, and the DEA results were invalid for only two cities. From 2014 to 2018, the mean TFPC in Jiangsu was less than 1, and the values exceeded 1 for only five cities.

conclusionThe equity of basic medical resources was better than that of financial resources, and the equity of geographical allocation was better than that of population allocation. The overall efficiency of health care resource allocation was high; however, the total factor productivity of the whole province has declined due to technological regression. Jiangsu Province needs to further optimize the allocation and increase the utilization efficiency of health care resources.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalChinaHealth Care RationingHealth EquityHumansEfficiencyEquityHealth care resourceProductivity

Identifiers

PMID33246458
PMCPMC7694921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.