Trial reportBMC cancer2020
Phase II randomized trial of capecitabine with bevacizumab and external beam radiation therapy as preoperative treatment for patients with resectable locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: long term results.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01043484 (Phase II Randomized Study to Compare Capecitabine + Bevacizumab Concomitantly With Radiotherapy Versus Capecitabine Concomitantly With Radiotherapy, as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Patients With Localized and Resectable Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Randomized Study to Compare Capecitabine + Bevacizumab Concomitantly With Radiotherapy Versus Capecitabine Concomitantly With Radiotherapy, as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Patients With Localized and Resectable Rectal Cancer
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathologic Complete Response and Survival in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- Strategies to Combat Resistance to Anti-angiogenesis Therapies in Cancer: Current Status and Future Prospects.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- "Defendit Numerus": A Pooled Analysis of 6145 Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Novel radiation and targeted therapy combinations for improving rectal cancer outcomes.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Advances in molecular targeted therapies to increase efficacy of (chemo)radiation therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023Review
- Cancer combination therapies by angiogenesis inhibitors; a comprehensive review.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine is considered as a standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. The "Tratamiento de Tumores Digestivos" group (TTD) previously reported in a randomized Ph II study that the addition of Bevacizumab to capecitabine-RT conferred no differences in the pre-defined efficacy endpoint (pathological complete response). We present the follow-up results of progression-free survival, distant relapse-free survival, and overall survival data at 3 and 5 years.
methodsPatients (pts) were randomized to receive 5 weeks of radiotherapy (45 Gy/25 fractions) with concurrent Capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily, 5 days per week with (arm A) or without (arm b) bevacizumab (5 mg/kg once every 2 weeks).
resultsIn our study, the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine and radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting shows no differences in pathological complete response (15.9% vs 10.9%), distant relapse-free survival (81.0 vs 80.4 and 76.2% vs 78.2% at 3 and 5 years respectively), disease-free survival (75% vs 71.7 and 68.1% vs 69.57% at 3 and 5 years respectively) nor overall survival at 5-years of follow-up (81.8% vs 86.9%).
conclusionsthe addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine plus radiotherapy does not confer statistically significant advantages neither in distant relapse-free survival nor in disease-free survival nor in Overall Survival in the short or long term.
trial registrationEudraCT number: 2009-010192-24 . Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01043484 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.