Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33246332›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2021

Staff recognition and its importance for surgical service delivery: a qualitative study in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Chris Willott, Nick Boyd, Haja Wurie, Isaac Smalle, T B Kamara, Justine I Davies, Andrew J M Leather

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Employed but Unpaid, Volunteers or Paradoxical Surplus? Sierra Leone's Unsalaried Health Workforce.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chris WillottKing's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King's College London, Room 2.13, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
Nick BoydKing's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King's College London, Room 2.13, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
Haja WurieCollege of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, PMB, New England Ville, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Isaac SmalleKing's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King's College London, Room 2.13, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
T B KamaraDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, 1 Percival Street, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Justine I DaviesCentre for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Andrew J M LeatherKing's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King's College London, Room 2.13, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
University of Sierra Leone · SLKings Health Partners · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the views of providers and users of the surgical system in Freetown, Sierra Leone on processes of care, job and service satisfaction and barriers to achieving quality and accessible care, focusing particularly on the main public tertiary hospital in Freetown and two secondary and six primary sites from which patients are referred to it. We conducted interviews with health care providers (N = 66), service users (n = 24) and people with a surgical condition who had chosen not to use the public surgical system (N = 13), plus two focus groups with health providers in primary care (N = 10 and N = 10). The overall purpose of the study was to understand perceptions on processes of and barriers to care from a variety of perspectives, to recommend interventions to improve access and quality of care as part of a larger study. Our research suggests that providers perceive their relationships with patients to be positive, while the majority of patients see the opposite: that many health workers are unapproachable and uncaring, particularly towards poorer patients who are unable or unwilling to pay staff extra in the form of informal payments for their care. Many health care providers note the importance of lack of recognition shown to them by their superiors and the health system in general. We suggest that this lack of recognition underlies poor morale, leading to poor care. Any intervention to improve the system should therefore consider staff-patient relations as a key element in its design and implementation, and ideally be led and supported by frontline healthcare workers.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchSierra Leonediscretionquality of careSierra Leonestaff moralesurgeryuser fees

Identifiers

PMID33246332
PMCPMC7938499
OpenAlexW3106763823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.