Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33245955›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2021

Investigating the performance of a novel pH and cathepsin B sensitive, stimulus-responsive nanoparticle for optimised sonodynamic therapy in prostate cancer.

Marym Mohammad Hadi, Heather Nesbitt, Hamzah Masood, Fabiola Sciscione, Shiv Patel, Bala S Ramesh, Mark Emberton, John F Callan, Alexander MacRobert, Anthony P McHale and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Recent Advances in Poly(α-Biomolecules · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Advanced nanomaterial for prostate cancer theranostics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marym Mohammad HadiDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, UK.
Heather NesbittBiomedical Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Hamzah MasoodDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, UK.
Fabiola SciscioneDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, UK.
Shiv PatelDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, UK.
Bala S RameshDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, UK.
Mark EmbertonDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, UK.
John F CallanBiomedical Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Alexander MacRobertDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, UK.
Anthony P McHaleBiomedical Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Nikolitsa NomikouDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, UK. Electronic address: n.nomikou@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17180Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nano-formulations that are responsive to tumour-related and externally-applied stimuli can offer improved, site-specific antitumor effects, and can improve the efficacy of conventional therapeutic agents. Here, we describe the performance of a novel stimulus-responsive nanoparticulate platform for the targeted treatment of prostate cancer using sonodynamic therapy (SDT). The nanoparticles were prepared by self-assembly of poly(L-glutamic acid-L-tyrosine) co-polymer with hematoporphyrin. The nanoparticulate formulation was characterized with respect to particle size, morphology, surface charge and singlet oxygen production during ultrasound exposure. The response of the formulation to the presence of cathepsin B, a proteolytic enzyme that is overexpressed and secreted in the tumour microenvironment of many solid tumours, was assessed. Our results showed that digestion with cathepsin B led to nanoparticle size reduction. In the absence of ultrasound, the formulation exhibited greater toxicity at acidic pH than at physiological pH, using the human prostate cells lines LNCaP and PC3 as targets. Nanoparticle cellular uptake was enhanced at acidic pH - a condition that was also associated with greater cathepsin B production. Nanoparticles exhibited enhanced ultrasound-induced cytotoxicity against both prostate cancer cell lines. Subsequent proof-of-concept in vivo studies demonstrated that, when ectopic human xenograft LNCaP tumours in SCID mice were treated with SDT using the systemically-administered nanoparticulate formulation at a single dose, tumour volumes decreased by up to 64% within 24 h. No adverse effects were observed in the nanoparticle-treated mice and their body weight remained stable. The potential of this novel formulation to deliver safe and effective treatment of prostate cancer is discussed.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesProstatic NeoplasmsAnimalsCathepsin BCell Line, TumorHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMiceMice, SCIDTumor MicroenvironmentCathepsin BCathepsin BNanoparticlesProstate cancerSensitizerSonodynamic therapyTumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID33245955
PMCPMC8551370
OpenAlexW3109529427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.