Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33245699›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Rapid Implementation of Video Visits in Neurology During COVID-19: Mixed Methods Evaluation.

Erika A Saliba-Gustafsson, Rebecca Miller-Kuhlmann, Samantha M R Kling, Donn W Garvert, Cati G Brown-Johnson, Anna Sophia Lestoquoy, Mae-Richelle Verano, Laurice Yang, Jessica Falco-Walter, Jonathan G Shaw and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. A Comparison of Patients' and Neurologists' Assessments of their Teleneurology Encounter: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Long COVID and Physical Therapy: A Systematic Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ethical, Legal, Organisational and Social Issues of Teleneurology: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Virtual Care and the Inverse Care Law: Implications for Policy, Practice, Research, Public and Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Erika A Saliba-Gustafsson *Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1587-9591
Rebecca Miller-Kuhlmann *Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8816-1700
Samantha M R KlingPrimary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9169-763X
Donn W GarvertPrimary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0827-9611
Cati G Brown-JohnsonPrimary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5415-3665
Anna Sophia LestoquoyPrimary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3493-0540
Mae-Richelle VeranoPrimary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1485-3461
Laurice YangDepartment of Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2794-2260
Jessica Falco-WalterDepartment of Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7654-9399
Jonathan G ShawPrimary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7884-3604
Steven M AschPrimary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5838-5335
Carl A GoldDepartment of Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-4152
Marcy WingetPrimary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5893-280X

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine has been used for decades. Despite its many advantages, its uptake and rigorous evaluation of feasibility across neurology's ambulatory subspecialties has been sparse. However, the COVID-19 pandemic prompted health care systems worldwide to reconsider traditional health care delivery. To safeguard health care workers and patients, many health care systems quickly transitioned to telemedicine, including across neurology subspecialties, providing a new opportunity to evaluate this modality of care.

objectiveTo evaluate the accelerated implementation of video visits in ambulatory neurology during the COVID-19 pandemic, we used mixed methods to assess adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, and perceptions of potential sustainability.

methodsVideo visits were launched rapidly in ambulatory neurology clinics of a large academic medical center. To assess adoption, we analyzed clinician-level scheduling data collected between March 22 and May 16, 2020. We assessed acceptability, appropriateness, and sustainability via a clinician survey (n=48) and semistructured interviews with providers (n=30) completed between March and May 2020.

resultsVideo visits were adopted rapidly; overall, 65 (98%) clinicians integrated video visits into their workflow within the first 6 implementation weeks and 92% of all visits were conducted via video. Video visits were largely considered acceptable by clinicians, although various technological issues impacted their satisfaction. Video visits were reported to be more convenient for patients, families, and caregivers than in-person visits; however, access to technology, the patient's technological capacity, and language difficulties were considered barriers. Many clinicians expressed optimism about future utilization of video visits in neurology. They believed that video visits promote continuity of care and can be incorporated into their practice long-term, although several insisted that they can never replace the in-person examination.

conclusionsVideo visits are an important addition to clinical care in ambulatory neurology and are anticipated to remain a permanent supplement to in-person visits, promoting patient care continuity, and flexibility for patients and clinicians alike.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansNeurologyTelemedicineacceptabilityambulatory neurologyCOVID-19implementationmixed methodsneurologyoutcomessustainabilitytelehealthtelemedicineteleneurologyvideovideo visits

Identifiers

PMID33245699
PMCPMC7732357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.