ArticleBrain and behavior2020
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis care in Saudi Arabia: A survey of providers' perceptions.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Disorders: Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Communication About End of Life for Patients Living With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Evidence.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis care in Saudi Arabia: A survey of providers' perceptions.Brain and behavior · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveProvision of care for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is complex and requires the contribution of multiple healthcare professionals. Several international ALS care measures were developed to ensure optimal care for ALS patients. We looked at the rate of inconsistency in providing standard ALS care measures in Saudi Arabia (SA).
methodsA 5-point response survey was distributed to practicing neurologists in SA. They were asked to grade their perceived consistency of accessibility for 19 items of ALS care measures at their center. The list of ALS care measures items was derived from international ALS guidelines.
resultsThe response rate from neurologists was 47.3% (62/131), and the responses of 39 neurologists who follow ALS cases were included. Most of the selected ALS care measure items, 63.1% (12/19), were perceived by 50% or more of the ALS care providers to be not consistently accessible to their patients. The perception of ALS care providers of the inconsistent accessibility for ALS patients to ALS care measures was high for communication devices (92.3%), supportive equipment such as motorized wheelchairs (76.9%), end-of-life discussion (74.4%), and respiratory monitoring (66.7%).
conclusionOur data show that ALS patients in SA do not have consistent access to the recommended ALS care measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.