ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2021
Clinical studies assessing the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of remdesivir in management of COVID-19: A scoping review.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- [Colchicine, an old friend's perspectives for rheumatology in COVID-19: a scoping review].Revista colombiana de reumatologia · 2022Review
- SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Lung Regeneration.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022Review
- A roadmap to pulmonary delivery strategies for the treatment of infectious lung diseases.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- Remdesivir: Quo vadis?Biochemical pharmacology · 2021Review
- Clinical studies assessing the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of remdesivir in management of COVID-19: A scoping review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Article
- Remdesivir shifts circadian rhythmicity to eveningness; similar to the most prevalent chronotype in ADHD.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021Article
- Novel pulmonary vascular imaging signs in COVID-19: pathophysiology, significance and management.BJR open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsRemdesivir is 1 of the repurposed drugs under investigation to treat patients with COVID-19. Clinicians and decision-makers need a summary of the most recent evidence. This scoping review maps the evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of remdesivir for patients with COVID-19, up to 14 September 2020.
methodsOur scoping review searched Pubmed, Embase (Ovid), Scopus and 17 primary trial registries for empirical publications or active registered clinical trials for data on the efficacy, effectiveness, or safety of remdesivir for COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the included publications.
resultsSeventeen empirical studies and 23 clinical trial registrations (n = 40) accumulated 46 508 participants. We found 4 published randomized-controlled trials accumulating 2293 patients. Two trials reported shorter median recovery time and better clinical status among patients who received remdesivir compared with the control groups. Observational studies report an association between remdesivir treatment and decreased mortality, as well as increased survival. The most common adverse reaction was hepatic impairment, although the trials reported a similar proportion of adverse events in the intervention and control groups.
conclusionRemdesivir might shorten the time to clinical improvement among hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19. Trial data report a similar proportion of adverse events in treated and control groups. The results of the 23 registered active trials, including more than 30 000 participants, will shed light on the efficacy and safety of the antiviral. The findings of the remaining clinical trials expected to report results in 2020 will allow a quantitative synthesis of available evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.