Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33245577›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Clinical studies assessing the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of remdesivir in management of COVID-19: A scoping review.

Juan Pimentel, Cassandra Laurie, Anne Cockcroft, Neil Andersson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Lung Regeneration.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Remdesivir: Quo vadis?Biochemical pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan PimentelCIET-PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6842-3064
Cassandra LaurieDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7039-9999
Anne CockcroftCIET-PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1558-1106
Neil AnderssonCIET-PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1121-6918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsRemdesivir is 1 of the repurposed drugs under investigation to treat patients with COVID-19. Clinicians and decision-makers need a summary of the most recent evidence. This scoping review maps the evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of remdesivir for patients with COVID-19, up to 14 September 2020.

methodsOur scoping review searched Pubmed, Embase (Ovid), Scopus and 17 primary trial registries for empirical publications or active registered clinical trials for data on the efficacy, effectiveness, or safety of remdesivir for COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the included publications.

resultsSeventeen empirical studies and 23 clinical trial registrations (n = 40) accumulated 46 508 participants. We found 4 published randomized-controlled trials accumulating 2293 patients. Two trials reported shorter median recovery time and better clinical status among patients who received remdesivir compared with the control groups. Observational studies report an association between remdesivir treatment and decreased mortality, as well as increased survival. The most common adverse reaction was hepatic impairment, although the trials reported a similar proportion of adverse events in the intervention and control groups.

conclusionRemdesivir might shorten the time to clinical improvement among hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19. Trial data report a similar proportion of adverse events in treated and control groups. The results of the 23 registered active trials, including more than 30 000 participants, will shed light on the efficacy and safety of the antiviral. The findings of the remaining clinical trials expected to report results in 2020 will allow a quantitative synthesis of available evidence.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdenosine MonophosphateAdultAlanineAntiviral AgentsHumansSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsremdesivirCOVID 19GS 5734remdesivirscoping reviewsevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID33245577
PMCPMC7753529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.