ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2021
Understanding management of poorly controlled pain in community-dwelling analgesic users: a qualitative study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Chronic pain is a prevalent and debilitating condition for many people. Globally it is the greatest contributor to years lived with disability. Management often includes pharmacotherapy and pharmacists are therefore well placed to contribute to chronic pain management. Objective To explore chronic pain management in community-dwelling analgesic users with poorly controlled pain and investigate potential barriers to adequate pain management. Setting Regional Victoria, Australia. Method A descriptive qualitative approach was used. People who had been prescribed an analgesic for at least 6 months and reported an average pain score over the last week of 4 or more out of 10 were interviewed about their pain management. Interviews followed a semi-structured interview guide. Thematic analysis of the data was undertaken followed by participant validation of the key themes. Main outcome measure Experience of chronic pain management. Results Three female and eight male people, aged between 34 and 77 years were interviewed. The study demonstrated that there was a diverse range of issues relating to chronic pain management that fitted into seven major themes: impact of pain on life, invisibility of pain, issues associated with healthcare professionals, general medication issues, attitude towards taking analgesics, medication adherence, and attitude towards other treatment options. Chronic pain had dramatically altered the lives of all participants and their families as they came to accept and learn to live with the pain they experienced. The main barrier to adequate pain management was the invisibility of pain, which resulted in health professionals undertreating the pain reported by participants. Participants desire to take as few analgesics as possible, the reluctance of GPs to prescribe opioids and healthcare professionals focus on misuse also contributed to poor pain management. Conclusion Participants were able to accept high levels of pain while minimizing analgesic use. The two main barriers to adequate pain management were the invisibility of pain, which resulted in health professionals not treating the pain reported by the participant and the perception of participants that analgesics should not need to be taken regularly in adequate doses for the rest of their lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.