ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Diagnosis of LI-RADS M lesions on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI: identifying cholangiocarcinoma-containing tumor with serum markers and imaging features.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI-diagnosis of category LR-M observations in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2022Pooled it
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for precise differentiation of hepatitis-related intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- LR-M for CT/MRI on LI-RADS v2018: a review of imaging criteria, performance, challenges and future directions from an end-user perspective.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma from mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with MRI and tumor markers: a multi-center study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Advanced imaging techniques at the crossroads of cholangiocarcinoma and liver transplantation: Can we bridge the gap?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
- Preoperative ternary classification using DCE-MRI radiomics and machine learning for HCC, ICC, and HIPT.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Radiologic and Pathologic Insights in Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: A Report of Three Cases.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Discontinuous peripheral enhancement of focal liver lesions on CT and MRI: outside the box of typical cavernous hemangioma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- How to differentiate between combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with rim arterial phase hyperenhancement?Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Benign and malignant focal liver lesions displaying rim arterial phase hyperenhancement on CT and MRI.Insights into imaging · 2024Review
- A model incorporating clinicopathologic and liver imaging reporting and data system-based magnetic resonance imaging features to identify hepatocellular carcinoma in LR-M observations.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2023Article
- Differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from atypical hepatocellular carcinoma using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging combined with serum markers in at-risk patients with hepatitis B virus.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Hypovascular Component in Arterial Phase to Help the Discrimination of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2023Article
- Prognosis of Primary Liver Cancer Based on LI-RADS Classification with Extracellular Agent-Enhanced MRI.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2023Article
- High-resolution MRI-based radiomics analysis to predict lymph node metastasis and tumor deposits respectively in rectal cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Article
- Hepatobiliary phase signal intensity: A potential method of diagnosing HCC with atypical imaging features among LR-M observations.PloS one · 2021Article
- Based on Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl DTPA-Enhanced MRI: Diagnostic Performance of the Category-Modified LR-5 Criteria in Patients At Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe LI-RADS M (LR-M) category describes hepatic lesions probably or definitely malignant, but not specific for hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients. Differentiation among LR-M entities, particularly detecting cholangiocarcinoma-containing tumors (M-CCs), is essential for treatment and prognosis. Thus, we aimed to develop diagnostic models on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI comprising serum tumor markers and LI-RADS imaging features for M-CC.
methodsConsecutive at-risk patients with LR-M lesions exclusively (no co-existing LR-4 and/or LR-5 lesions) were retrieved retrospectively from a prospectively collected database spanning 3 years. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (c-HCC-CCA) were classified together as M-CC. LI-RADS features determined by three independent radiologists and clinically relevant serum tumor markers were used to generate M-CC diagnostic models through logistic regression analysis against histology. Per-patient performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsForty-five patients were included, 42.2% (19/45) with hepatocellular carcinoma, 33.3% (15/45) with ICC, 13.3% (6/45) with c-HCC-CCA, and 11.1% (5/45) with other hepatic lesions. Carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 > 38 U/mL, α-fetoprotein (AFP) > 4.8 ng/mL, and absence of the LI-RADS feature "blood products in mass" were significant predictors of M-CC. Combining three predictors demonstrated AUC of 0.862, sensitivity of 76%, and specificity of 88%. The risk of M-CC with all three criteria fulfilled was 98% (AUC, 0.690; sensitivity, 38%; specificity, 100%).
conclusionsIn at-risk patients with LR-M lesions, integrating CA19-9, AFP, and the LI-RADS feature "blood products in mass" achieved high diagnostic performance for M-CC. When all three criteria were fulfilled, the specificity for M-CC was 100%. KEY POINTS: • In at-risk patients who had LR-M lesions exclusively (no concomitant LR-4/5 lesions), a model with carbohydrate antigen > 38 U/mL, α-fetoprotein > 4.8 ng/mL, and absence of the LI-RADS feature "blood products in mass" achieved high accuracy for diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma-containing tumors. • In patients of whom all three criteria were fulfilled, the specificity for M-CC was 100%, which might reduce or eliminate the need for biopsy confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.