ArticleHeart and vessels2021
Predictors of neo-aortic valve regurgitation in the long term after arterial switch operation.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Complex Aortic Valve Repair after en-Bloc Rotation of the Outflow Tracts" - Case Report.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although arterial switch operations (ASOs) have been performed globally to repair d-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA) in neonates and infants, few studies have been reported regarding the influence of the hemodynamics of patients with d-TGA who have undergone ASO on the development of neo-aortic valve regurgitation (AR). We aimed to investigate the relationship between the hemodynamics and development of AR after ASO in patients with d-TGA by catheter evaluation. This observational study screened 114 consecutive patients who underwent ASO for d-TGA or Taussig-Bing anomaly and who subsequently underwent catheter evaluations in our institution. We reviewed their records for the past 20 years and collected their first catheterization data post-ASO in early childhood. Thirty-six post-ASO patients who underwent catheter evaluations in both the early surgical and long-term phases were finally analyzed. Patients were divided into the following groups according to the presence of significant AR in the long-term phase: the AR group (n = 9 with AR ≥ grade II by the Sellers classification) and the non-AR group (n = 27 with AR < grade II). In the long-term phase, the diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower and the ascending aortic diameter was significantly larger in the AR group than in the non-AR group (p = 0.004 and p = 0.006, respectively). The systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) were similar in both groups. Meanwhile, in the early surgical phase, SBP and PP were significantly higher in the AR group than in the non-AR group (p = 0.029 and p = 0.002, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic curve for late AR showed that the area under the curve for SBP and PP in the early surgical phase were 0.746 and 0.853, respectively. Even though sensitivity analysis was performed, SBP or PP greater than the cutoff value in the early surgical phase was identified as predictors for late AR. Our results suggested that high SBP or PP in the early surgical phase could influence the development of AR in the long term after ASO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.