Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33245463›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular drugs and therapy2021

BK

Ana Paula Ferraz, Fernando A C Seara, Emanuelle F Baptista, Thais S Barenco, Thais B B Sottani, Natalia S C Souza, Ainá E Domingos, Raiana A Q Barbosa, Christina M Takiya, Marcos T Couto and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Paula FerrazCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fernando A C SearaCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Emanuelle F BaptistaCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Thais S BarencoCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Thais B B SottaniCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Natalia S C SouzaCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ainá E DomingosCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Raiana A Q BarbosaCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Christina M TakiyaCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Marcos T CoutoCampus Rio de Janeiro, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Gabriel O ResendeCampus Rio de Janeiro, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Antonio C Campos de CarvalhoCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Cristiano G PonteCampus Rio de Janeiro, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Jose Hamilton M NascimentoCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. jhmn@biof.ufrj.br.ORCID 0000-0001-7052-254X
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRInstituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the present study, the therapeutic efficacy of a selective BK

methodsPAH was induced in male Wistar rats by a single injection of MCT. After two weeks, the MCT-treated group was divided into two groups that were either treated with compound X or vehicle. Compound X was administered daily at 28 mg/kg. Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and haemodynamic analyses were performed; ex vivo evaluations of pulmonary artery reactivity, right ventricle (RV) and lung histology as well as expression levels of α and β myosin heavy chain, brain natriuretic peptide, and cytokines (TNFα and IL10) in heart tissue were performed.

resultsPulmonary artery rings of the PAH group showed a lower vasodilatation response to acetylcholine, suggesting endothelial dysfunction. Compound X promoted strong vasodilation in pulmonary artery rings of both control and MCT-induced PAH rats. The untreated hypertensive rats presented remodelling of pulmonary arterioles associated with increased resistance to pulmonary flow; increased systolic pressure, hypertrophy and fibrosis of the RV; prolongation of the QT and T

conclusionThe use of a selective and potent opener to activate the BK

Indexed as

Calcium Channel AgonistsLarge-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium ChannelsPulmonary Arterial HypertensionAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalQuinolinesRatsRats, WistarTreatment OutcomeVascular RemodelingVascular ResistanceVasoconstrictionVasodilationVentricular Function, Right1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolineCalcium Channel AgonistsLarge-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium ChannelsQuinolinesBKCa channel openerMonocrotalinePulmonary arterial hypertensionRight ventricular dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID33245463
OpenAlexW3108587846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.