Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33245435›Full record

SynthesisArchives of women's mental health2021

A systematic review of EPDS cultural suitability with Indigenous mothers: a global perspective.

Ai Wen Chan, Corinne Reid, Petra Skeffington, Rhonda Marriott

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of women's mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Paternal Postpartum Depression in South Asia.Public health challenges · 2026
    Review
  6. Pretesting Parenting Instruments with Indigenous Fathers and Two-Spirit Parents: A Qualitative Study.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ai Wen ChanSchool of Psychology, Exercise Science, Chiropractic & Counselling, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia. wenn.chan@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1054-6392
Corinne ReidVictoria University, Melbourne, Australia. Corinne.Reid@ed.ac.uk.
Petra SkeffingtonPsychology, Exercise Science, Chiropractic & Counselling, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
Rhonda MarriottNgangk Yira Research Centre for Aboriginal Health and Social Equity, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is used extensively as the "gold standard" perinatal depression and anxiety screening tool. This study contributes to an emerging discussion about the tool's shortcomings, specifically around cultural suitability for use with Indigenous women. A systematic search was conducted in ProQuest, PsycINFO, MEDLINE (Web of Science), PubMed, Scopus, Informit, and CINAHL research databases, and grey literature. The quality of the body of evidence was assessed using the NHMRC Level of Evidence framework. Three studies supported the cultural validation of the EPDS with Indigenous groups in Canada (n = 2) and the USA (n = 1). The remaining eleven Australian studies demonstrated that cultural concerns were suggested by either Indigenous mothers, healthcare professionals (Indigenous and non-Indigenous), or both, though cultural concerns were more weighted from the perspectives of healthcare professionals. The quality of the evidence was not strong, and thus, there is a critical and urgent need for targeted research in this area. This review identified and recommended Indigenous-specific methodologies that can be adopted for more trustworthy, culturally safe, and effective research in this area. Given that the EPDS is currently considered gold standard in routine perinatal mental health screening practice in countries around the world, these findings raise significant concerns. Using culturally relevant research methodologies, such as the use of mixed-methods design, could lay stronger groundwork for further investigation of the broader utility and cultural relevance of the tool.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumMothersAustraliaCanadaFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPregnancyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAcceptabilityEdinburgh Postnatal Screening Scale (EPDS)IndigenousPerinatal mental healthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33245435
PMCPMC8116293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.