Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33245280›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Influence of Scanner Precision and Analysis Software in Quantifying Three-Dimensional Intraoral Changes: Two-Factor Factorial Experimental Design.

Saoirse O'Toole, David Bartlett, Andrew Keeling, John McBride, Eduardo Bernabe, Luuk Crins, Bas Loomans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of the accuracy of a fully digital method of measuring sagittal condylar inclination.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Saoirse O'Toole *Centre for Clinical, Oral and Translational Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2144-1847
David BartlettCentre for Clinical, Oral and Translational Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8599-8401
Andrew KeelingUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4598-3744
John McBrideUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3024-0326
Eduardo BernabeCentre for Clinical, Oral and Translational Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1858-3713
Luuk CrinsRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9360-1179
Bas LoomansRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6684-9723
King's College London · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThree-dimensional scans are increasingly used to quantify biological topographical changes and clinical health outcomes. Traditionally, the use of 3D scans has been limited to specialized centers owing to the high cost of the scanning equipment and the necessity for complex analysis software. Technological advances have made cheaper, more accessible methods of data capture and analysis available in the field of dentistry, potentially facilitating a primary care system to quantify disease progression. However, this system has yet to be compared with previous high-precision methods in university hospital settings.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare a dental primary care method of data capture (intraoral scanner) with a precision hospital-based method (laser profilometer) in addition to comparing open source and commercial software available for data analysis.

methodsLongitudinal dental wear data from 30 patients were analyzed using a two-factor factorial experimental design. Bimaxillary intraoral digital scans (TrueDefinition, 3M, UK) and conventional silicone impressions, poured in type-4 dental stone, were made at both baseline and follow-up appointments (mean 36 months, SD 10.9). Stone models were scanned using precision laser profilometry (Taicaan, Southampton, UK). Three-dimensional changes in both forms of digital scans of the first molars (n=76) were quantitatively analyzed using the engineering software Geomagic Control (3D Systems, Germany) and freeware WearCompare (Leeds Digital Dentistry, UK). Volume change (mm

resultsThe median (IQR) volume change for Geomagic using profilometry and using the intraoral scan was -0.37 mm

conclusionsAs expected, the method of data capture, software used, and measurement metric all significantly influenced the measurement outcome. However, when appropriate analysis was used, the primary care system was able to quantify the degree of change and can be recommended depending on the accuracy needed to diagnose a condition. Lower-resolution scanners may underestimate complex changes when measuring at the micron level.

Indexed as

AdultComputer-Aided DesignFemaleGermanyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLongitudinal StudiesMaleMouthResearch DesignSoftwarediagnostic systemsdigital imaging/radiologyengineeringimagingoutcomes researchtooth wear

Identifiers

PMID33245280
PMCPMC7732705
OpenAlexW3045967650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.