Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33245114›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Robustifying genomic classifiers to batch effects via ensemble learning.

Yuqing Zhang, Prasad Patil, W Evan Johnson, Giovanni Parmigiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuqing ZhangClinical Bioinformatics, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA 94404, USA.
Prasad PatilDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
W Evan JohnsonDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6247-6595
Giovanni ParmigianiDepartment of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Funding

VectorP30CA006516 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI JENNIFER W MACK · 1985 to 2026
$330.6M
Removing batch effects in high-throughput biomedical studiesR01GM127430 · NIGMS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI William Evan Johnson · 2018 to 2026
$2.4M
Division of Mathematical Sciences, National Science Foundation (NSF-DMS) 1810829National Institutes of Health (NIH-NCI) 4P30CA006516-51NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006516NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127430The National Cancer Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGenomic data are often produced in batches due to practical restrictions, which may lead to unwanted variation in data caused by discrepancies across batches. Such 'batch effects' often have negative impact on downstream biological analysis and need careful consideration. In practice, batch effects are usually addressed by specifically designed software, which merge the data from different batches, then estimate batch effects and remove them from the data. Here, we focus on classification and prediction problems, and propose a different strategy based on ensemble learning. We first develop prediction models within each batch, then integrate them through ensemble weighting methods.

resultsWe provide a systematic comparison between these two strategies using studies targeting diverse populations infected with tuberculosis. In one study, we simulated increasing levels of heterogeneity across random subsets of the study, which we treat as simulated batches. We then use the two methods to develop a genomic classifier for the binary indicator of disease status. We evaluate the accuracy of prediction in another independent study targeting a different population cohort. We observed that in independent validation, while merging followed by batch adjustment provides better discrimination at low level of heterogeneity, our ensemble learning strategy achieves more robust performance, especially at high severity of batch effects. These observations provide practical guidelines for handling batch effects in the development and evaluation of genomic classifiers. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material. Processed data is available in the Github repository with implementation code, at https://github.com/zhangyuqing/bea_ensemble. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID33245114
PMCPMC8485848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.