ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Robustifying genomic classifiers to batch effects via ensemble learning.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging insights into CC and CXC chemokines and their receptors in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.FEBS open bio · 2026Review
- A multimodal approach for visualizing and identifying electrophysiological cell types in vivo.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A multimodal approach for visualization and identification of electrophysiological cell typesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- AITeQ: a machine learning framework for Alzheimer's prediction using a distinctive five-gene signature.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Comparison of the effectiveness of different normalization methods for metagenomic cross-study phenotype prediction under heterogeneity.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of normalization methods for predicting quantitative phenotypes in metagenomic data analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- In search of the ratio of miRNA expression as robust biomarkers for constructing stable diagnostic models among multi-center data.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Batch normalization followed by merging is powerful for phenotype prediction integrating multiple heterogeneous studies.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Hierarchical resampling for bagging in multistudy prediction with applications to human neurochemical sensing.The annals of applied statistics · 2022Article
- An immuno-score signature of tumor immune microenvironment predicts clinical outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Bioinformatics-based study to identify immune infiltration and inflammatory-related hub genes as biomarkers for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Immunogenetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGenomic data are often produced in batches due to practical restrictions, which may lead to unwanted variation in data caused by discrepancies across batches. Such 'batch effects' often have negative impact on downstream biological analysis and need careful consideration. In practice, batch effects are usually addressed by specifically designed software, which merge the data from different batches, then estimate batch effects and remove them from the data. Here, we focus on classification and prediction problems, and propose a different strategy based on ensemble learning. We first develop prediction models within each batch, then integrate them through ensemble weighting methods.
resultsWe provide a systematic comparison between these two strategies using studies targeting diverse populations infected with tuberculosis. In one study, we simulated increasing levels of heterogeneity across random subsets of the study, which we treat as simulated batches. We then use the two methods to develop a genomic classifier for the binary indicator of disease status. We evaluate the accuracy of prediction in another independent study targeting a different population cohort. We observed that in independent validation, while merging followed by batch adjustment provides better discrimination at low level of heterogeneity, our ensemble learning strategy achieves more robust performance, especially at high severity of batch effects. These observations provide practical guidelines for handling batch effects in the development and evaluation of genomic classifiers. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material. Processed data is available in the Github repository with implementation code, at https://github.com/zhangyuqing/bea_ensemble. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.