Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33245070›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2020

Prostatic artery embolization in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: perfusion cone-beam CT to evaluate planning and treatment response.

Marco Pandolfi, Alessandro Liguori, Martina Gurgitano, Antonio Arrichiello, Letizia Di Meglio, Giovanni Maria Rodà, Alice Guadagni, Salvatore Alessio Angileri, Anna Maria Ierardi, Giorgio Buccimazza and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marco PandolfiRadiology Unit, Istituto Clinico Città Studi Milano, via Niccolò Jommelli, 17, 20131 Milano, Italy. marcopandolfi.mp@gmail.com.
Alessandro LiguoriOperative Unit of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milano, Italy. alessandroliguori.medicina@gmail.com.
Martina GurgitanoDivision of Radiology, IEO European institute of oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy . martina.gurgitano@gmail.com.
Antonio ArrichielloPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli studi di Milano, via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. arrichielloantonio@gmail.com.
Letizia Di MeglioPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli studi di Milano, via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. letiziadimeglio@gmail.com.
Giovanni Maria RodàPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli studi di Milano, via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. giovannimariaroda@gmail.com.
Alice GuadagniOperative Unit of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milano, Italy. alice.guadagni37@gmail.com.
Salvatore Alessio AngileriOperative Unit of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milano, Italy. ang.alessio@yahoo.it.
Anna Maria IerardiOperative Unit of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milano, Italy. amierardi@yahoo.it.
Giorgio BuccimazzaPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli studi di Milano, via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. giorgio.bcmz@live.it.
Daniela DonatClinical Center od Vojvodina, Center for Radiology, Serbia, Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 1. skorpija_dd@yahoo.com.
Aldo PaolucciOperative Unit of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milano, Italy. aldo.paolucci@policlinico.mi.it.
Gianpaolo CarrafielloOperative Unit of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy. Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milano, Italy; Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. gcarraf@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This proof of concept is to evaluate the utility of perfusion cone-beam computed tomography (CT) in patients undergoing prostatic artery (PA) embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with moderate or severe-grade lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). PAE is a novel minimally invasive therapy and is both safe and effective procedure with low risks and high technical successes, making this procedure as the best alternative to surgery. A lot of technical changes would compromise clinical outcomes after procedure, including a variable prostate vascular anatomy, thin PA, and extensive atherosclerotic disease. The purpose of our study is to exploit the advantages of Perfusion Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) that could impact treatment and help interventional radiologists for treatment planning, diagnosis and for assessing the technical feasibility during PAE, mitigating the risk of nontarget embolization and suggesting clinical outcomes. Qualitative and quantitative clinical pre- and post-treatment values will be compared, to reach the best possible results.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticProstatic HyperplasiaArteriesCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMalePerfusionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33245070
PMCPMC8023075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.