Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33244728›Full record

SynthesisCNS drugs2020

Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Insomnia Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Chiranth Bhagavan, Stacey Kung, Marjan Doppen, Mary John, Iva Vakalalabure, Karen Oldfield, Irene Braithwaite, Giles Newton-Howes

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CNS drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Using Cannabis and CBD to Sleep: An Updated Review.Current psychiatry reports · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advising Around Cannabis for Sleep: Clearing Up the Smoke.Current research in complementary & alternative medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Cannabis and sleep disorders: not ready for prime time? A qualitative scoping review.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cannabis use in patients with insomnia and sleep disorders: Retrospective chart review.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  18. The Effects of Cannabinoids on Sleep.Journal of primary care & community health
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chiranth BhagavanSchool of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand. Chiranth.Bhagavan@ccdhb.org.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7983-4280
Stacey KungMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
Marjan DoppenMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
Mary JohnMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
Iva VakalalabureMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
Karen OldfieldMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
Irene BraithwaiteMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
Giles Newton-HowesSchool of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand · NZVictoria University of Wellington · NZCapital and Coast District Health Board · NZUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsomnia is associated with significant comorbidity, disability and impact on quality of life and, despite advances in pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, remains a significant burden to society. Cannabinoids are gaining acceptance for use as medicines in the treatment of insomnia disorder.

objectiveWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of cannabinoids in the treatment of insomnia disorder.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete databases from inception to 5 December 2019, and again prior to data abstraction, for studies of cannabis-based products for the treatment of insomnia disorder in adults. Inclusion criteria were (1) clinical studies, (2) participants aged ≥ 18 years, (3) insomnia disorder either formally diagnosed against contemporaneous diagnostic criteria or quantified with validated instruments and (4) compared cannabis-based products with the standard of care, placebo or a sedative. No language restrictions were imposed. Non-primary research, animal studies and studies of cannabis-induced insomnia were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomized trials. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I

resultsA total of five studies (two RCTs and three non-randomised studies) with 219 study participants were included, of which three could be combined. The three non-randomised studies contributed data on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire score, showing a favourable effect of cannabinoids at ≤ 4 weeks of follow-up (mean difference - 1.89 [95% confidence interval {CI} - 2.68 to - 1.10]; n = 176) and at 8 weeks of follow-up (mean difference - 2.41 [95% CI - 3.36 to - 1.46]; n = 166). One double-blind crossover RCT (n = 32) reported that, compared with amitriptyline, nabilone-a synthetic analogue to tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-improved Insomnia Severity Index scores after 2 weeks of treatment (adjusted difference - 3.25 [95% CI - 5.26 to - 1.24]) and resulted in a more restful sleep as a sub-measure of the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) (difference 0.48 [95% CI 0.01-0.95]) but with no effect on overall sleep quality as measured by the LSEQ. In a single ascending-dose RCT (n = 9), THC reduced sleep-onset latency compared with placebo at 10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg doses (mean difference - 43.00 min [95% CI - 82.76 to - 3.24], - 62.00 [95% CI - 103.60 to - 20.40] and - 54.00 [95% CI - 103.93 to - 4.07], respectively). All the included studies were assessed as poor quality, mainly due to small sample sizes, short treatment periods, uncertain clinical significance and high risk of bias.

conclusionsFew studies have examined the efficacy of cannabinoids in the treatment of insomnia disorder. Despite some possible signals for efficacy, the heterogeneity of participants, interventions, efficacy outcomes and results, and the high risk of bias across included trials, do not reliably inform evidence-based practice. This review highlights shortcomings in the existing literature, including lack of diagnostic clarity, poorly defined participant groups, non-standardised interventions and studies of inappropriate design, duration and power to detect clinically meaningful outcomes. Further research in the form of high-quality RCTs are required before drawing any conclusions about the efficacy of cannabinoids in the treatment of insomnia disorder.

trial registrationPROSPERO registration number, CRD42020161043.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultCannabinoidsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersTreatment OutcomeCannabinoids

Identifiers

PMID33244728
OpenAlexW3108902469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.