Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33244585›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Probabilistic framework for integration of mass spectrum and retention time information in small molecule identification.

Eric Bach, Simon Rogers, John Williamson, Juho Rousu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric BachDepartment of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Simon RogersSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3578-4477
John WilliamsonSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Juho RousuDepartment of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

Funding

Aalto Science-IT infrastructureAcademy of Finland 310107Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R018634/1Scottish Informatics and Computing Science Alliance
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIdentification of small molecules in a biological sample remains a major bottleneck in molecular biology, despite a decade of rapid development of computational approaches for predicting molecular structures using mass spectrometry (MS) data. Recently, there has been increasing interest in utilizing other information sources, such as liquid chromatography (LC) retention time (RT), to improve identifications solely based on MS information, such as precursor mass-per-charge and tandem mass spectrometry (MS2).

resultsWe put forward a probabilistic modelling framework to integrate MS and RT data of multiple features in an LC-MS experiment. We model the MS measurements and all pairwise retention order information as a Markov random field and use efficient approximate inference for scoring and ranking potential molecular structures. Our experiments show improved identification accuracy by combining MS2 data and retention orders using our approach, thereby outperforming state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate the benefit of our model when only a subset of LC-MS features has MS2 measurements available besides MS1. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software and data are freely available at https://github.com/aalto-ics-kepaco/msms_rt_score_integration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

SoftwareTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, LiquidModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID33244585
PMCPMC8289373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.