Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33244224›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2020

Perceived Illness and Treatment Adherence to Hypertension Among Patients Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Rajina Shakya, Sunil Shrestha, Roshani Gautam, Lalita Rai, Sabindra Maharjan, Gita Kumari Satyal, Bhuvan Kc, Mana Kumari Rai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rajina ShakyaDepartment of Nursing, Nobel College, Pokhara University, Sinamangal, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0001-9049-702X
Sunil ShresthaDepartment of Pharmacy, Nepal Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-9174-7120
Roshani GautamMaharajgunj Nursing Campus, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Medicine Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Lalita RaiMaharajgunj Nursing Campus, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Medicine Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sabindra MaharjanCentral Bureau of Statistics, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Gita Kumari SatyalFemale Surgical Ward, Department of Nursing, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bhuvan KcSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya 47500, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9135-962X
Mana Kumari RaiMaharajgunj Nursing Campus, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Medicine Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital · NPMonash University Malaysia · MYNepal Development Research Institute · NPNLR Nepal · NPPokhara University · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHypertension (HTN) is a silent killer, accountable for life-threatening complications. An individual's illness perception may affect adherence to treatment which is crucial to prevent complications of HTN. The objective of this study was to identify illness perception and treatment adherence among patients with HTN in a tertiary hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal.

methodsDescriptive correlational study was conducted in the out-patient department of Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Center, Kathmandu Nepal. Non-probability purposive sampling was used. A face-to-face interview was conducted from September to December 2018, using a structured questionnaire that included socio-demographic variables, illness perception questionnaire (revised) and Hill bone compliance to high blood pressure therapy scale. Data analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistics (chi-square test, Spearman rank correlation).

resultsAmong 204 participants, 51% were male, 77% were literate, mean ± S.D. age was 60±12. About 72% experienced headache and 88% said that headache is related to HTN. Behavioural factors and psychological factors were regarded as the leading cause of HTN. Almost 63% participants believed HTN as highly threatening illness. Higher scores in timeline (acute/chronic), personal control, and treatment control revealed that patients believed HTN as a chronic disease with a higher rate of personal and treatment control. Regarding treatment adherence, the mean score was 16.58 (SD = 2.08), and only 14.7% had perfect adherence. Participants were more adherent to medication and appointment keeping rather than reduce salt intake. Duration of HTN diagnosis (

conclusionIllness perception and treatment adherence are correlated. Hence, it is beneficial to improve illness perception to achieve perfect treatment adherence. Reinforcement is essential to maintain adherence to both medications and behaviour therapy.

Indexed as

hypertensionillness perceptionNepaltreatment adherence

Identifiers

PMID33244224
PMCPMC7685346
OpenAlexW3105808066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.