Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33244218›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Dynamic Pupillometry in Type 2 Diabetes: Pupillary Autonomic Dysfunction and the Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Samyukta Bista Karki, Kirsten J Coppell, Logan V Mitchell, Kelechi C Ogbuehi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Application of Pupillometry in Neurocritical Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samyukta Bista KarkiDrishti Eye Care Center, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal.
Kirsten J CoppellDepartment of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0996-2874
Logan V MitchellDepartment of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Kelechi C OgbuehiDepartment of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8046-251X
University of Otago · NZTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAutonomic dysfunction may precede the microvascular changes that characterise diabetic retinopathy. The aim of this pilot study was to measure and compare pupillometry indices in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients - with and without diabetic retinopathy - and in healthy, age-matched controls.

methodsTwo hundred and eleven participants with T2DM aged 45-80 years were recruited from Dunedin Hospital Eye Department, Dunedin, New Zealand. They were categorised into three groups - no, mild/moderate, or severe diabetic retinopathy. Seventy age-matched, diabetes screen negative control participants were recruited from the Dunedin city community. Dynamic pupillometry was performed using an infrared pupillometer. The main outcome measures were maximum constriction velocity, average constriction velocity, absolute constriction amplitude, relative reflex amplitude, average dilation velocity and 75% re-dilation (recovery) time. Outcome measures were compared between study groups using the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test (with Dunn's multiple comparison post-test).

resultsPupillary parasympathetic function differed between groups. Maximum constriction velocity (p <0.001) and average constriction velocity (p <0.001) were slower, and absolute constriction amplitude (p <0.001) and relative reflex amplitude (p <0.05) were lower in the three diabetes groups compared with controls. There were no significant differences in pupillary sympathetic function between the four groups for re-dilation time, but the diabetes groups had significantly slower average dilation velocity times.

conclusionPupillary light reflex is significantly impaired with diabetic retinal neuropathy, before clinically observable signs of diabetic retinopathy. Dynamic pupillometry may be a cheap, clinically relevant test, but sensitivity and specificity need to be determined before utilising as a screening tool for diabetic retinopathy.

Indexed as

diabetic autonomic neuropathydiabetic macular oedemadiabetic retinopathyparasympathetic nervous systempupillary reflextype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID33244218
PMCPMC7683350
OpenAlexW3100891524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.