Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33244192›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental review : DR2020

Studying a Moving Target in Development: The Challenge and Opportunity of Heterotypic Continuity.

Isaac T Petersen, Daniel Ewon Choe, Brandon LeBeau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental review : DR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Annual Research Review: Early conduct problems - precursors, outcomes, and etiology.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Positioning adolescence in the developmental timeline.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. What is Parental Monitoring?Clinical child and family psychology review · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isaac T PetersenUniversity of Iowa.
Daniel Ewon ChoeUniversity of California, Davis.
Brandon LeBeauUniversity of Iowa.

Funding

Cognitive Control in the Development of School Readiness in Early ChildhoodR01HD098235 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI PETERSEN, ISAAC T · 2020 to 2024
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD098235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many psychological constructs show heterotypic continuity-their behavioral manifestations change with development but their meaning remains the same (e.g., externalizing problems). However, research has paid little attention to how to account for heterotypic continuity. Conceptual and methodological challenges of heterotypic continuity may prevent researchers from examining lengthy developmental spans. Developmental theory requires that measurement accommodate changes in manifestation of constructs. Simulation and empirical work demonstrate that failure to account for heterotypic continuity when collecting or analyzing longitudinal data results in faulty developmental inferences. Accounting for heterotypic continuity may require using different measures across time with approaches that link measures on a comparable scale. Creating a developmental scale (i.e., developmental scaling) is recommended to link measures across time and account for heterotypic continuity, which is crucial in understanding development across the lifespan. The current synthesized review defines heterotypic continuity, describes how to identify it, and presents solutions to account for it. We note challenges of addressing heterotypic continuity, and propose steps in leveraging opportunities it creates to advance empirical study of development.

Indexed as

changing measuresconstruct validity invariancedevelopmental scalingfactorial invarianceheterotypic continuitylongitudinal

Identifiers

PMID33244192
PMCPMC7685252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.