Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33244090›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Effects of the technique and drill design used during the osteotomy on the thermal and histological stimulation.

Sergio Alexandre Gehrke, Tiago Luis Eliers Treichel, Jaime Aramburú Júnior, Piedad N de Aza, Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergio Alexandre GehrkeDepartment of Research, Biotecnos - Technology and Science, Cuareim 1483, 11100, Montevideo, Uruguay. sergio.gehrke@hotmail.com.
Tiago Luis Eliers TreichelDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidade de Rio Verde, 104, Rio Verde, GO, 75901-970, Brazil.
Jaime Aramburú JúniorDepartment of Research, Biotecnos - Technology and Science, Cuareim 1483, 11100, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Piedad N de AzaInstituto de Bioingenieria, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Avda. Ferrocarril s/n., 03202, Elche (Alicante), Spain.
Juan Carlos Prados-FrutosDepartment of Medical Specialties and Public Health, IDIBO Group (High Performance Group in Research and Development of Biomaterials in Dentistry), Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of our in vivo study was to compare the effects of the osteotomy on the thermal alterations, the bone healing and count of polymorphonuclear cells, comparing the drill design (cylindrical or conical) using continuous or intermittent movement. Twelve rabbits were used, which were made four osteotomies (n = 2 per tibia) to simulate the surgical drilling sequence for the installation of a dental implant at 8 mm of length and regular diameter. Four groups were proposed: group G1, cylindrical drill with continuous movement; group G2, cylindrical drill with intermittent movement; group G3, conical drill with continuous movement; and, group G4, conical drill with intermittent movement. Thermal mean variation was 6.91 ± 1.4 °C in group 1, 4.30 ± 1.3 °C in group 2, 2.78 ± 0.6 °C in group 3, and 2.77 ± 0.7 °C in group 4. Whereas the mean area of new bone formation was 1.00 ± 0.3 mm

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleOsteotomyRabbitsTemperatureTibiaWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID33244090
PMCPMC7691358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.