Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33244047›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The implications of thumb movements for Neanderthal and modern human manipulation.

Ameline Bardo, Marie-Hélène Moncel, Christopher J Dunmore, Tracy L Kivell, Emmanuelle Pouydebat, Raphaël Cornette

Abstract readComparative StudyHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Whole-bone shape of hominoid manual proximal phalanges.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. From fossils to mind.Communications biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Trabecular bone ontogeny tracks neural development and life history among humans and non-human primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ameline BardoSkeletal Biology Research Centre, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, UK. A.Bardo-2183@kent.ac.uk.
Marie-Hélène MoncelDépartement Homme et environnement, UMR7194-HNHP (CNRS - MNHN - UPVD - Sorbonne Universités), 1 rue René-Panhard, 75005, Paris, France.
Christopher J DunmoreSkeletal Biology Research Centre, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, UK.
Tracy L KivellSkeletal Biology Research Centre, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, UK.
Emmanuelle PouydebatUMR 7179 Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution (CNRS, MNHN), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 55 rue Buffon, 75005, Paris, France.
Raphaël CornetteInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, CP 50, 57 rue Cuvier, 75005, Paris, France.

Funding

European Research Council 819960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much research has debated the technological abilities of Neanderthals relative to those of early modern humans, with a particular focus on subtle differences in thumb morphology and how this may reflect differences in manipulative behaviors in these two species. Here, we provide a novel perspective on this debate through a 3D geometric morphometric analysis of shape covariation between the trapezial and proximal first metacarpal articular surfaces of Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) in comparison to early and recent humans (Homo sapiens). Results show a distinct pattern of shape covariation in Neanderthals, consistent with more extended and adducted thumb postures that may reflect habitual use of grips commonly used for hafted tools. Both Neanderthals and recent humans demonstrate high intraspecific variation in shape covariation. This intraspecific variation is likely the result of genetic and/or developmental differences, but may also reflect, in part, differing functional requirements imposed by the use of varied tool-kits. These results underscore the importance of holistic joint shape analysis for understanding the functional capabilities and evolution of the modern human thumb.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsAnthropology, PhysicalBiological EvolutionFemaleFossilsHand StrengthHistory, 21st CenturyHistory, AncientHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMetacarpal BonesModels, BiologicalMovementNeanderthals

Identifiers

PMID33244047
PMCPMC7692544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.