Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33243897›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021

Estimating Local Cellular Density in Glioma Using MR Imaging Data.

E D H Gates, J S Weinberg, S S Prabhu, J S Lin, J Hamilton, J D Hazle, G N Fuller, V Baladandayuthapani, D T Fuentes, D Schellingerhout

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Liquid biopsies for early diagnosis of brain tumours:Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

E D H GatesFrom the Departments of Imaging Physics (E.D.H.G., J.S.L., J.D.H., D.T.F.).ORCID 0000-0002-0829-6286
J S WeinbergNeurosurgery (J.S.W., S.S.P.).ORCID 0000-0001-5587-6673
S S PrabhuNeurosurgery (J.S.W., S.S.P.).ORCID 0000-0002-8155-0623
J S LinFrom the Departments of Imaging Physics (E.D.H.G., J.S.L., J.D.H., D.T.F.).ORCID 0000-0002-0146-4232
J HamiltonNeuroradiology (J.H., D.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-7335-8706
J D HazleFrom the Departments of Imaging Physics (E.D.H.G., J.S.L., J.D.H., D.T.F.).ORCID 0000-0003-4695-5825
G N FullerPathology (G.N.F.).ORCID 0000-0001-9447-2647
V BaladandayuthapaniDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics (V.B.), University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-9107-3157
D T FuentesFrom the Departments of Imaging Physics (E.D.H.G., J.S.L., J.D.H., D.T.F.).ORCID 0000-0002-2572-6962
D SchellingerhoutNeuroradiology (J.H., D.S.) Dawid.Schellingerhout@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0003-3659-435X
Laboratoire d’Imagerie Biomédicale · FRS.P.E.C.I.E.S. · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USFaculty of 1000 (United Kingdom) · GBPartners In Care · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINET15LM007093 · NLM · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI Lydia E. Kavraki · 1992 to 2026
$20.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIncreased cellular density is a hallmark of gliomas, both in the bulk of the tumor and in areas of tumor infiltration into surrounding brain. Altered cellular density causes altered imaging findings, but the degree to which cellular density can be quantitatively estimated from imaging is unknown. The purpose of this study was to discover the best MR imaging and processing techniques to make quantitative and spatially specific estimates of cellular density. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe collected stereotactic biopsies in a prospective imaging clinical trial targeting untreated patients with gliomas at our institution undergoing their first resection. The data included preoperative MR imaging with conventional anatomic, diffusion, perfusion, and permeability sequences and quantitative histopathology on biopsy samples. We then used multiple machine learning methodologies to estimate cellular density using local intensity information from the MR images and quantitative cellular density measurements at the biopsy coordinates as the criterion standard.

resultsThe random forest methodology estimated cellular density with

conclusionsCellular density can be estimated with moderate-to-strong correlations using MR imaging inputs. The random forest machine learning model provided the best estimates. These spatially specific estimates of cellular density will likely be useful in guiding both diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGliomaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID33243897
PMCPMC7814791
OpenAlexW3106919110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.