Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33243818›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

National administrative record linkage between specialist community drug and alcohol treatment data (the National Drug Treatment Monitoring System (NDTMS)) and inpatient hospitalisation data (Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)) in England: design, method and evaluation.

Emmert Roberts, James C Doidge, Katie L Harron, Matthew Hotopf, Jonathan Knight, Martin White, Brian Eastwood, Colin Drummond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prediction of individualised 6-month mortality risk in opioid use disorder.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Linking education and hospital data in England: linkage process and quality.International journal of population data science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Emmert RobertsNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, United Kingdom emmert.roberts@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4152-5570
James C DoidgeIntensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Katie L HarronGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3418-2856
Matthew HotopfDeaprtment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan KnightPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Martin WhitePublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Brian Eastwood *Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Colin Drummond *National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBPublic Health England · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBIntensive Care National Audit & Research Centre · GB

Funding

Department of Health 13/86/03Department of Health RP-PG-0609-10162Medical Research Council G0701681Medical Research Council G0701818Medical Research Council MR/N00616X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 212953/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe creation and evaluation of a national record linkage between substance misuse treatment, and inpatient hospitalisation data in England.

designA deterministic record linkage using personal identifiers to link the National Drug Treatment Monitoring System (NDTMS) curated by Public Health England (PHE), and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Admitted Patient Care curated by National Health Service (NHS) Digital. SETTING AND

participantsAdults accessing substance misuse treatment in England between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2019 (n=268 251) were linked to inpatient hospitalisation records available since 1 April 1997. OUTCOME MEASURES: Using a gold-standard subset, linked using NHS number, we report the overall linkage sensitivity and precision. Predictors for linkage error were identified, and inverse probability weighting was used to interrogate any potential impact on the analysis of length of hospital stay.

results79.7% (n=213 814) people were linked to at least one HES record, with an estimated overall sensitivity of between 82.5% and 83.3%, and a precision of between 90.3% and 96.4%. Individuals were more likely to link if they were women, white and aged between 46 and 60. Linked individuals were more likely to have an average length of hospital stay ≥5 days if they were men, older, had no fixed residential address or had problematic opioid use. These associations did not change substantially after probability weighting, suggesting they were not affected by bias from linkage error.

conclusionsLinkage between substance misuse treatment and hospitalisation records offers a powerful new tool to evaluate the impact of treatment on substance related harm in England. While linkage error can produce misleading results, linkage bias appears to have little effect on the association between substance misuse treatment and length of hospital admission. As subsequent analyses are conducted, potential biases associated with the linkage process should be considered in the interpretation of any findings.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsState MedicineAdolescentAdultEnglandFemaleHospitalizationHospitalsHumansInpatientsMaleMedical Record LinkageMiddle AgedYoung AdultPharmaceutical Preparationsepidemiologypublic healthsubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID33243818
PMCPMC7692978
OpenAlexW3107136258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.