Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33243811›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Individualised physical exercise training and enhanced protein intake in older citizens during municipality-based rehabilitation: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Sanel Teljigovic, Karen Søgaard, Louise Fleng Sandal, Tina Dalager, Nina Odgaard Nielsen, Gisela Sjøgaard, Lars Holm

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04091308 (Individualized Physical Exercise Training and Enhanced Protein Intake in Older Citizens During Municipality-based Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04091308 nacompletednot on this map

Individualized Physical Exercise Training and Enhanced Protein Intake in Older Citizens During Municipality-based Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College AbsalonRan2020 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsRehabilitationArmsUsual Care, Usual Care with Protein Supplementation, Individualized Physical Exercise Training with Protein Supplementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exercise Prescription for the Work-Life Population and Beyond.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sanel TeljigovicDepartment of Physiotherapy, University College Absalon, Naestved, Denmark sate@pha.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-7784-7451
Karen SøgaardDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3968-6364
Louise Fleng SandalDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8436-1046
Tina DalagerDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Nina Odgaard NielsenDepartment of Physiotherapy, University College Absalon, Naestved, Denmark.
Gisela SjøgaardDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Lars HolmSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
University of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity College Absalon · DKUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSuccessful rehabilitation of the growing number of older citizens receiving healthcare services can lead to preservation of functional independence and improvement in quality of life. Adequate intake of dietary protein and physical training are key factors in counteracting the age-related decline in strength performance and physical function. However, during rehabilitation, many older people/persons have insufficient protein intake, and difficulties in performing exercise training with sufficient intensity and volume. The primary aim of this trial is to investigate if individualised physical exercise training programmes combined with increased protein intake (IPET+P) can improve measures on all International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health levels, such as strength, gait speed and health-related quality of life, when compared with care as usual in municipality-based rehabilitation alone (usual care, UC) or care as usual in combination with increased protein intake (UC+P). Further, the trial investigates whether UC+P will potentiate more significant improvements in outcome measures than UC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The trial is a three-armed multicentre, block-randomised controlled trial consisting of a 12-week intervention period with a 1-year follow-up. Citizens above 65 years referred to rehabilitation in the municipality without restricting comorbidities are eligible. Participants are randomised to either a UC group, a UC group with protein supplementation receiving 27.5 g protein/day (UC+P), or an IPET+P supplementation of 27.5 g protein/day. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire is the primary outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approvals from The Ethics Committee in Region Zealand, Denmark (SJ-758 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04091308.

Indexed as

ExerciseAgedAged, 80 and overExercise TherapyHealth StatusHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CareProteinsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesProteinsgeriatric medicinenutrition & dieteticssports medicine

Identifiers

PMID33243811
PMCPMC7692977
OpenAlexW3109120207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.